2013
DOI: 10.1080/10402381.2013.857742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water chemistry preferences of five nonnative aquatic macrophyte species in Connecticut: a preliminary risk assessment tool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A multivariate analysis of water chemistry preferences for five invasive alien aquatic macrophytes in Connecticut (USA) revealed similar preferences for M. heterophyllum and Cabomba caroliniana, much different than those preferred by M. spicatum, Najas minor or Potamogeton crispus [47]. The…”
Section: Habitat and Water Physicochemical Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A multivariate analysis of water chemistry preferences for five invasive alien aquatic macrophytes in Connecticut (USA) revealed similar preferences for M. heterophyllum and Cabomba caroliniana, much different than those preferred by M. spicatum, Najas minor or Potamogeton crispus [47]. The…”
Section: Habitat and Water Physicochemical Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A multivariate analysis of water chemistry preferences for five invasive alien aquatic macrophytes in Connecticut (USA) revealed similar preferences for M. heterophyllum and Cabomba caroliniana, much different than those preferred by M. spicatum, Najas minor or Potamogeton crispus [47]. The probability to find M. heterophyllum increased over 0.5 with a conductivity <91 µS cm −1 ; other factors significantly affecting species presence were longitude, alkalinity and pH but not total phosphorus [47]. However, another study on invasive populations of M. heterophyllum in New Hampshire lakes showed that this species occurred mainly in large, low elevation systems with relatively high pH, alkalinity and conductivity [48].…”
Section: Channelmentioning
confidence: 98%