Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Background Dry matter is a routine test for all animal feeds, facilitating feed comparisons and diet formulation. It is the most frequent test, yet the most challenging with respect to precision and accuracy. Objective Our objective was to evaluate the accuracy, repeatability, and physicochemical impacts of oven-drying times on laboratory dry matter test results in animal feeds obtained by loss on drying at 105 °C. Method Eighteen primary samples collected from different feed sources were grouped into high- and low-moisture content materials. The tested methods were based on loss on drying: at 105 °C and Karl Fischer titration was adopted as the reference method. Test portions were oven dried at 105 °C for 3, 6, 12, 16, and 24 h, and test results were compared to the reference method. Test portions were also subjected to a color evaluation using a colorimetric technique. Results The method based on 3 h of drying provided the closest estimates to those obtained by Karl Fischer titration. Extending heating time (i.e., above 3 h) increases the bias, especially for high moisture feeds, which was attributed to a higher occurrence of non-enzymatic reactions. This was corroborated by the color of the residues, which became darker with increased heating time. The repeatability of loss on drying methods was considered adequate, ranging from 0.32 to 0.73%. Conclusions The loss-on-drying method based on the binomial 105 °C × 3 h minimizes the bias in the water recovery and causes less non-enzymatic browning in the test portions. Highlights The loss-on-drying method recommended for laboratory dry matter in animal feeds is drying the test portions at 105 °C for 3 h.
Background Dry matter is a routine test for all animal feeds, facilitating feed comparisons and diet formulation. It is the most frequent test, yet the most challenging with respect to precision and accuracy. Objective Our objective was to evaluate the accuracy, repeatability, and physicochemical impacts of oven-drying times on laboratory dry matter test results in animal feeds obtained by loss on drying at 105 °C. Method Eighteen primary samples collected from different feed sources were grouped into high- and low-moisture content materials. The tested methods were based on loss on drying: at 105 °C and Karl Fischer titration was adopted as the reference method. Test portions were oven dried at 105 °C for 3, 6, 12, 16, and 24 h, and test results were compared to the reference method. Test portions were also subjected to a color evaluation using a colorimetric technique. Results The method based on 3 h of drying provided the closest estimates to those obtained by Karl Fischer titration. Extending heating time (i.e., above 3 h) increases the bias, especially for high moisture feeds, which was attributed to a higher occurrence of non-enzymatic reactions. This was corroborated by the color of the residues, which became darker with increased heating time. The repeatability of loss on drying methods was considered adequate, ranging from 0.32 to 0.73%. Conclusions The loss-on-drying method based on the binomial 105 °C × 3 h minimizes the bias in the water recovery and causes less non-enzymatic browning in the test portions. Highlights The loss-on-drying method recommended for laboratory dry matter in animal feeds is drying the test portions at 105 °C for 3 h.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.