2021
DOI: 10.3390/ani11113268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water Distribution Systems in Pig Farm Buildings: Critical Elements of Design and Management

Abstract: Drinking water distribution systems (WDSs) within buildings on pig farms have critical elements of their design and management that impact water provision to pigs, water quality, the efficacy of in-water antimicrobial dosing, and, thus, pig health and performance. We used a mixed-methods approach to survey managers of 25 medium to large single-site and multi-site pig farming enterprises across eastern and southern Australia. We found wide variation in the configuration (looped or branched) and total length of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The distance to the start of the water distribution system was relatively long in Drinker A, where the overall lowest bacteria counts were seen. This disagrees with the previous consideration that a lower water velocity might increase the biofilm formation [84,85], because less biofilm is flushed out. This stands out especially when compared to Drinker B, which showed high bacteria counts and harboured specific pathogens, but, similarly to Drinker A, involved the longest distance to the start of the water distribution system.…”
Section: Distribution Of Bacterial Content In the Drinkerscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The distance to the start of the water distribution system was relatively long in Drinker A, where the overall lowest bacteria counts were seen. This disagrees with the previous consideration that a lower water velocity might increase the biofilm formation [84,85], because less biofilm is flushed out. This stands out especially when compared to Drinker B, which showed high bacteria counts and harboured specific pathogens, but, similarly to Drinker A, involved the longest distance to the start of the water distribution system.…”
Section: Distribution Of Bacterial Content In the Drinkerscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Decreases in water pressure and water velocity could occur with longer distances from the main piping system. Both the dead ends and the distances could facilitate biofilm formation in the areas examined in this study [84,85]. Additionally, seasonal changes could affect biofilm formation [86], but in this study, air temperature data was not continuously collected.…”
Section: Distribution Of Bacterial Content In the Drinkersmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Besides environment, drinking water and water pipes could be another reservoir of ETEC (90). Due to the fact that looped water distribution systems have less dead endings compared to branched water distribution systems, accumulation of sediments and bio lm formation is less likely (91). Thus, infections with ETEC via contaminated water coming from water pipelines with branched endings could be more likely, since ETEC are frequently recovered from bio lms in water pipes (90,92).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The homogeneity and stability of the drug in medicated feed and medicated drinking water must be assured until the moment of intake by the animals. The residual concentrations or in other words the remaining concentrations of the antimicrobial drug in feed or water after the end of treatment, and the homogeneity and stability of medicated feed and medicated drinking water is likely to be influenced by a) the methods used for preparing, transporting, and storing medicated feed and drinking water [25], b) the materials used to construct the feed and drinking water pipelines and their design [26][27][28][29], c) the number of treatment days [7], d) the pharmaceutical formulation used [30,31], and e) the cleaning protocol of the pipelines [2]. Human errors when preparing and administering the medication may also occur if the medication is prepared at the farm instead of bought from a Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP)-certified feed manufacturer [32,33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%