2017
DOI: 10.1080/00221686.2017.1354932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water flow and sediment transport at open-channel confluences: an experimental study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
57
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exposure of the bar at low flow stage enhances the steering effect, forcing flow toward the right bank of the CS and contributing to the development of jet‐like flow within the confluence. Though documented in some laboratory (Schindfessel et al, ; Yuan et al, ) and discordant confluences (Guillén Ludeña et al, ; Sukhodolov et al, ), jet‐like flow at concordant confluences is a departure from the standard conceptual model of asymmetrical confluences (Rhoads, ). At SALINE, flow separation was caused mainly by the local protrusion of the bank near the downstream junction corner of the SD along with retreat of the channel bank associated with channel widening downstream from the protrusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exposure of the bar at low flow stage enhances the steering effect, forcing flow toward the right bank of the CS and contributing to the development of jet‐like flow within the confluence. Though documented in some laboratory (Schindfessel et al, ; Yuan et al, ) and discordant confluences (Guillén Ludeña et al, ; Sukhodolov et al, ), jet‐like flow at concordant confluences is a departure from the standard conceptual model of asymmetrical confluences (Rhoads, ). At SALINE, flow separation was caused mainly by the local protrusion of the bank near the downstream junction corner of the SD along with retreat of the channel bank associated with channel widening downstream from the protrusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the previous studies, a depositional sediment bar is formed as a result of the reduced pressure and secondary circulations at the separation zone close to the inner wall of the post‐confluence channel (Nazari‐Giglou et al, ; Shakibainia, Majdzadeh‐Tabatabai, & Zarrati, ; Yuan et al, ). Biron, Richer, Kirkbride, Roy, and Han () reported that greater values of lateral flow and densimetric Froude number lead to a farther distance of sediment bar from the beginning of post‐confluence channel, that is, higher N values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, increasing the vane angle and pier diameter leads to more scouring. In another experimental study, Yuan, Tang, Xiao, Qiu, and Xia () investigated the effect of increasing the lateral discharge to a junction with 90° confluence angle and observed that the location of maximum scour depth moves downstream in parallel to the main channel wall. Amini, Balouchi, and Shafai‐Bajestan () studied the effect of collars on reducing the scour depth in a channel confluence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite extensive investigation of hydrodynamics, morphodynamics, and mixing at river confluences in the last decades using field, laboratory and numerical methods [18][19][20], only two studies have focused on HEF in river confluences so far. Song et al [21] and Cheng et al [22] studied HEF about a river confluence, looking at the influence of hydraulic conductivity and river morphology on vertical hyporheic fluxes (VHF), which were investigated through a one-dimensional steady-state heat model, using temperature time series with resistance temperature detectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%