2013
DOI: 10.1111/gwat.12076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Water Flowing Uphill Is One of the Commonest Facts of Nature”: The Emergence of a Visual Language for Groundwater Geology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, in the second half of the 19th century, many European cities chose to develop water resources from groundwater. Brick (2013) mentioned that water table or potentiometric surfaces were originally represented explicitly in cross-sections from 1850 onwards (Clutterbuck 1850). Water table or potentiometric maps for unconfined and confined conditions were presented, first in Belgium by Gustave Dumont in 1856, followed by Delesse (1858Delesse ( , 1862 in France, Lucas (1874) in the UK (Mather et al 2004), Gümbel (1875) and Thiem (1876) in Germany, Veeren (1893) and Pennink (1904) in The Netherlands and King (1899) and Darton (1909) in the United States.…”
Section: International Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, in the second half of the 19th century, many European cities chose to develop water resources from groundwater. Brick (2013) mentioned that water table or potentiometric surfaces were originally represented explicitly in cross-sections from 1850 onwards (Clutterbuck 1850). Water table or potentiometric maps for unconfined and confined conditions were presented, first in Belgium by Gustave Dumont in 1856, followed by Delesse (1858Delesse ( , 1862 in France, Lucas (1874) in the UK (Mather et al 2004), Gümbel (1875) and Thiem (1876) in Germany, Veeren (1893) and Pennink (1904) in The Netherlands and King (1899) and Darton (1909) in the United States.…”
Section: International Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th e continued use of two-dimensional geologic maps on paper, the original form of the inclusive genre as well as its chief standard until recent memory, might easily be dismissed by some non-mappers as evidence for the static nature-or, worse yet, stagnation-of geologic mapping as a scientific endeavor. Some authors have declared that traditional geologic maps-and perhaps even those in digital format-are experiencing a decline in use and perceived relevance (e.g., Broome 2005), a problem that others attribute to the public's limited ability to decipher maps (Brick 2013). None of this predicament can be considered more the fault of geology or geologists than that of larger society.…”
Section: Dimensions and Digitalitymentioning
confidence: 99%