1993
DOI: 10.1006/jare.1993.1062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water funnelling by the crown of Flourensia cernua, a Chihuahuan Desert shrub

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
2
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
41
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as to biotic mechanisms, although the canopy structure (Mauchamp and Janeau, 1993;Crockford and Richardson, 2000;Pypker et al, 2011) and branch architecture (Herwitz, 1987;Murakami, 2009;Carlyle-Moses and Schooling, 2015) have been studied for years, the most important plant traits vary with location and shrub species and have not yet been determined. The effects of the leaves have been studied more recently at a smaller scale, e.g., leaf orientation (Crockford and Richardson, 2000), shape (Xu et al, 2005), arrangement pattern (Owens et al, 2006), pubescence (Garcia-Estringana et al, 2010), area (Sellin et al, 2012), epidermis microrelief (RothNebelsick et al, 2012), amount , or biomass (Yuan et al, 2016).…”
Section: Yuan Et Al: Comparisons Of Stemflow and Its Bio-/abioticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as to biotic mechanisms, although the canopy structure (Mauchamp and Janeau, 1993;Crockford and Richardson, 2000;Pypker et al, 2011) and branch architecture (Herwitz, 1987;Murakami, 2009;Carlyle-Moses and Schooling, 2015) have been studied for years, the most important plant traits vary with location and shrub species and have not yet been determined. The effects of the leaves have been studied more recently at a smaller scale, e.g., leaf orientation (Crockford and Richardson, 2000), shape (Xu et al, 2005), arrangement pattern (Owens et al, 2006), pubescence (Garcia-Estringana et al, 2010), area (Sellin et al, 2012), epidermis microrelief (RothNebelsick et al, 2012), amount , or biomass (Yuan et al, 2016).…”
Section: Yuan Et Al: Comparisons Of Stemflow and Its Bio-/abioticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interception losses by A. ordosica and C. korshinskii accounted for 15% and 27% of the precipitation on a crown area basis and 6% and 11% of the precipitation on a ground area basis [12,13]. The interception losses were less than those in the Chihuahua and Negev deserts, where the interception loss accounted for 10%-60% of the rainfall [14][15][16][17][18], mainly due to the sparse shrub canopy structure and lower leaf area index. Therefore, with regards to rainfall interception, species with relatively sparse stems and branches should be selected as potential sand-binding species [12,13].…”
Section: Rainfall Interception and Redistribution By Sandbinding Shrubsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even comparatively minor micro-climatic gradients at very small spatial scales had significant effects on understorey plants growing beneath the Retama canopy, as indicated by the substantial decrease in plant productivity from the centre to the intermediate canopy positions. The canopy also produces spatial variation in soil moisture by rainfall interception (Pressland 1973;Mauchamp & Janeau 1993;M. J. Moro, unpublished data) and hydraulic lift of water from deep-seated sources (Caldwell & Richards 1989;Caldwell 1990;Dawson 1993).…”
Section: The Role Of Littermentioning
confidence: 99%