DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8562-8_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water Influence on Mechanical Behaviour of Pavements: Experimental Investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…samples with e 0 = 0.32). These results appear to be consistent with the observations of Davis (1949), Sivakumar et al (2002), Sánchez-Leal (2002), Ampadu (2007), Cekerevac et al (2009), andPurwana et al (2012) for the variation of CBR with water content in incompressible geomaterials.…”
Section: Influence Of Initial Compactionsupporting
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…samples with e 0 = 0.32). These results appear to be consistent with the observations of Davis (1949), Sivakumar et al (2002), Sánchez-Leal (2002), Ampadu (2007), Cekerevac et al (2009), andPurwana et al (2012) for the variation of CBR with water content in incompressible geomaterials.…”
Section: Influence Of Initial Compactionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…The extensive amount of past research on the CBR of saturated soils led to the development of standards such as ASTM D1883 (ASTM D1883-07e2, 2007) or AASHTO T193 (AASHTO T193-10, 2010) for the determination of CBR in saturated geomaterials. In unsaturated soils, many of the experimental observations such as the early contributions of Davis (1949) or Black (1962) or the recent studies of Sánchez-Leal (2002) or Cekerevac et al (2009) were mainly confined to examine the influence of soil moisture content (ω) on CBR. Additionally, efforts were carried out to investigate the variation of CBR with respect to the matrix suction or the degree of saturation of the soil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of fines content criteria aims to avoid capillary suction of water through the aggregate and to avoid loss of stability due to excess water, especially during thawing periods. Moisture sensitivity in unbound aggregates is strongly related to mineralogy (Cekerevac et al 2009). Hauck (1989) suggested that the mineral composition of fines should be taken into account in addition to the amount of fines, based on tests showing that aggregates containing mica have lower bearing capacity.…”
Section: Grading and Fines Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%