2019
DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.1273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water influences how seed production responds to conspecific and heterospecific pollen

Abstract: Premise Outcrossing species depend on pollen from conspecific individuals that may not be exposed to the same abiotic conditions as maternal plants. Additionally, many flowers receive heterospecific pollen, which can also influence seed production. Studies aimed to understand how abiotic conditions influence seed production tend to focus on maternal conditions and leave unexplored the effect of abiotic conditions experienced by pollen donors. We tested how water availability to pollen donors, both conspecific … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In hand pollination treatments, the HP proportion is usually different from under natural conditions (Caruso & Alfaro, 2000 ; Celaya et al, 2015 ; Da Silva & Sargent, 2011 ; Lanuza et al, 2021 ; Moragues & Traveset, 2005 ), which may artificially inflate fitness effects relative to natural conditions. Nevertheless, we were able to detect deleterious effects of HP even under natural conditions with most flowers receiving small proportions of HP, similar to previous reports that relatively low proportions of heterospecific pollen are associated with reduced seed production under some environmental conditions (Bruckman & Campbell, 2016 ; Recart et al, 2019 ). Moreover, a mixture of species contributed HP to S .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In hand pollination treatments, the HP proportion is usually different from under natural conditions (Caruso & Alfaro, 2000 ; Celaya et al, 2015 ; Da Silva & Sargent, 2011 ; Lanuza et al, 2021 ; Moragues & Traveset, 2005 ), which may artificially inflate fitness effects relative to natural conditions. Nevertheless, we were able to detect deleterious effects of HP even under natural conditions with most flowers receiving small proportions of HP, similar to previous reports that relatively low proportions of heterospecific pollen are associated with reduced seed production under some environmental conditions (Bruckman & Campbell, 2016 ; Recart et al, 2019 ). Moreover, a mixture of species contributed HP to S .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For example, deposition of low-quality pollen could decrease the b1 slope, since additional low-quality pollen may not lead to the same increase in seed production as additional deposition of high-quality pollen. In natural populations of P. parryi , it is possible that the initial slope of seeds on pollen would also vary with water availability, because water supplied to donors is known to influence seed production in this species, likely through variation in pollen quality ( Recart et al 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fertilized water contained a mix with 95 % of Peters Professional 20-20-20 complete water-soluble fertilizer and 5 % of Best Ammonium Sulfate 21-0-0 at a concentration of 350–400 ppm in water. The low-water treatment simulated average February precipitation from 1906 to 2014 for Santa Ana, CA, and the high-water treatment simulated twice the average precipitation value ( Recart et al 2019 ). Thirty P. parryi individuals—randomly chosen from the germinated bulk seeds—were used as recipient plants, with 15 exposed to a low-water treatment and the other 15 exposed to a high-water treatment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also possible that pollen quality or quantity was different across the 2 years. For example, in Phacelia parryi, variation in water availability to conspecific pollen donors influenced seed production, presumably by affecting pollen quality (Recart et al 2019). Differences in pollen production across years have been suggested to explain differences in the relationship between pollinator visitation and seed production for Ipomopsis aggregata, a common species at our field sites (Waser and Price 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%