2018
DOI: 10.1675/063.041.0105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water Level Fluctuations Influence Wading Bird Prey Availability and Nesting in a Subtropical Lake Ecosystem

Abstract: BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, Shad use of and production on the Fourche LaFave floodplain in 2007, making up more than 90% of all emigrants, undoubtedly had positive ecological effects for both aquatic and terrestrial predators. Shad and other high‐production fishes frequently serve as important forage food for many predatory fishes (Robison & Buchanan, 2020) and fish‐eating birds (Chastant & Gawlik, 2018; Christie et al, 2021; Fenech et al, 2004). Indeed, large schools of Shad were observed swimming throughout the floodplain and main stem of the Arkansas River in late summer and autumn (L. Lewis & R. Adams, pers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Shad use of and production on the Fourche LaFave floodplain in 2007, making up more than 90% of all emigrants, undoubtedly had positive ecological effects for both aquatic and terrestrial predators. Shad and other high‐production fishes frequently serve as important forage food for many predatory fishes (Robison & Buchanan, 2020) and fish‐eating birds (Chastant & Gawlik, 2018; Christie et al, 2021; Fenech et al, 2004). Indeed, large schools of Shad were observed swimming throughout the floodplain and main stem of the Arkansas River in late summer and autumn (L. Lewis & R. Adams, pers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We fit models with a negative binomial distribution to account for overdispersion in annual nest counts. We included lake stage, recession rate, and Carolina willow ( Salix caroliniana ) availability index as fixed effects that represent foraging habitat availability, prey availability, and nest substrate availability, respectively (Havens and Gawlik 2005, Chastant et al 2017, Chastant and Gawlik 2018, Gawlik et al 2020). We included lake stage (March‐April) and water level recession rate as linear and quadratic terms and included the linear terms in an interaction term.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5B). It can be attributed to the reduction in prey density with an increase in the volume of water; hence too much volume could indicate poor habitat for breeding of Painted Stork (Chastant and Gawlik, 2018). Also, the Painted Stork is a tactile forager, and it is dependent on physical contact for capturing the prey than visual senses; hence the volume of water can be detrimental to foraging efficiency (Urfi, 2011).…”
Section: Water Availability and Breeding Population Of Painted Storkmentioning
confidence: 99%