2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water proton density in human cortical bone obtained from ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI predicts bone microstructural properties

Abstract: Purpose: To investigate the correlations between cortical bone microstructural properties and total water proton density (TWPD) obtained from three-dimensional ultrashort echo time Cones (3D-UTE-Cones) magnetic resonance imaging techniques.Materials and Methods: 135 cortical bone samples were harvested from human tibial and femoral midshafts of 37 donors (61±24 years old). Samples were scanned using 3D-UTE-Cones sequences on a clinical 3T MRI and on a high-resolution micro-computed tomography (μCT) scanner. TW… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
20
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(86 reference statements)
0
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…58 A mixture of distilled water and deuterated water (e.g., 20% H 2 O and 80% D 2 O, 22 mol/L 1 H) doped with manganese chloride and titrated to match the effective T2 Ã of cortical bone (e.g., T2 Ã $ 0.4 ms) has been used as the external reference by several research groups, 50,53,55,57,58 Although it should be noted that any material with known apparent PD and with a range of MRI properties similar to bone, such as a rubber eraser, can be used as the external phantom. 59 The estimated TW content in cortical bone showed significant correlations with bone microstructural properties. 58,59 ►Fig.…”
Section: Total Water Imaging In Cortical Bone With Ute-mrimentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…58 A mixture of distilled water and deuterated water (e.g., 20% H 2 O and 80% D 2 O, 22 mol/L 1 H) doped with manganese chloride and titrated to match the effective T2 Ã of cortical bone (e.g., T2 Ã $ 0.4 ms) has been used as the external reference by several research groups, 50,53,55,57,58 Although it should be noted that any material with known apparent PD and with a range of MRI properties similar to bone, such as a rubber eraser, can be used as the external phantom. 59 The estimated TW content in cortical bone showed significant correlations with bone microstructural properties. 58,59 ►Fig.…”
Section: Total Water Imaging In Cortical Bone With Ute-mrimentioning
confidence: 90%
“…59 The estimated TW content in cortical bone showed significant correlations with bone microstructural properties. 58,59 ►Fig. 3 shows conventional GRE, 2D UTE, and 2D adiabatic inversion recovery UTE (IR-UTE) imaging of the tibial midshaft of a volunteer.…”
Section: Total Water Imaging In Cortical Bone With Ute-mrimentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several research groups have used a mixture of distilled water and deuterated water (e.g., 20% H 2 O and 80% D2O, 22 mol/L 1 H) doped with MnCl2 and titrated to match the effective T2 * of cortical bone (e.g., T2 * ≈ 0.4 ms) as the external reference for this estimation technique (38,39,41,43,44), but, notably, any phantom with known apparent proton density and with a range of MRI properties similar to bone, such as a rubber eraser, can be used (45). Significant correlations have been reported between the estimated TW content in human cortical bone and its microstructural properties (44,45). For accurate estimation of TW content, we should consider, first, the difference between relaxation times of cortical bone and the external phantom, second, the spatial variation of coil sensitivity in scanned field of view (FOV), and third, the duration of radiofrequency (RF) pulse and its inhomogeneity [or actual flip angle (FA)] (38,70).…”
Section: Ute Mri Quantification Of Cortical Bone Ute Imaging Of Totalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For accurate estimation of TW content, we should consider, first, the difference between relaxation times of cortical bone and the external phantom, second, the spatial variation of coil sensitivity in scanned field of view (FOV), and third, the duration of radiofrequency (RF) pulse and its inhomogeneity [or actual flip angle (FA)] (38,70). Due to the short T1 in cortical bone, the T1 effect on the TW content calculation can be neglected if one uses a relatively low FA combined with a relatively high repetition time (TR) in a proton density (PD)-weighted UTE sequence (45).…”
Section: Ute Mri Quantification Of Cortical Bone Ute Imaging Of Totalmentioning
confidence: 99%