2017
DOI: 10.1002/2016wr019954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water quality and ecosystem management: Data‐driven reality check of effects in streams and lakes

Abstract: This study investigates nutrient‐related water quality conditions and change trends in the first management periods of the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD; since 2009) and Baltic Sea Action Plan (BASP; since 2007). With mitigation of nutrients in inland waters and their discharges to the Baltic Sea being a common WFD and BSAP target, we use Sweden as a case study of observable effects, by compiling and analyzing all openly available water and nutrient monitoring data across Sweden since 2003. The data compil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is an important coastal-marine water environment for the nine countries within the total Baltic Sea catchment area of 1,739,400 km 2 [3]. From this catchment, the Baltic Sea receives a total freshwater discharge of around 480 km 3 /year; this total discharge also carries with it considerable waterborne nutrient loads [19] that depend greatly on the discharge magnitude [20] and its hydro-climatically determined variability and change [21]. Furthermore, the Baltic Sea has a relatively small exchange of sea water through its narrow connection with the North Sea at the Danish Straits [22].…”
Section: The Baltic Seamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an important coastal-marine water environment for the nine countries within the total Baltic Sea catchment area of 1,739,400 km 2 [3]. From this catchment, the Baltic Sea receives a total freshwater discharge of around 480 km 3 /year; this total discharge also carries with it considerable waterborne nutrient loads [19] that depend greatly on the discharge magnitude [20] and its hydro-climatically determined variability and change [21]. Furthermore, the Baltic Sea has a relatively small exchange of sea water through its narrow connection with the North Sea at the Danish Straits [22].…”
Section: The Baltic Seamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The near-complete lack of phosphorous concentration response (Figure 3b; dashed red line) to the land-surface and surface-water oriented measures is consistent with dominant contributions from subsurface legacy sources, which are not affected by these measures. Such legacy source contributions can also more generally explain failures to meet WFD-related goals in the regional Norrström basin (Andersson, Jarsjö, & Petersson, 2014;Darracq et al, 2008) and elsewhere in Sweden (Destouni et al, 2017).…”
Section: Management Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the nutrient-related solute release scenarios in this study remain relevant even though the nutrient data used to quantify them are for earlier periods (1984-2000 for the Kalmar case and 1980-1993 for the Vistula case). Since then, nutrient concentrations discharged from Kalmar County have remained stable, or even increased rather than decreased, over the period 2003-2013 (see [45] and specifically the trend data for TP and TN at the Kalmar coast in their figures 7 and 8, respectively). Meanwhile reported flow-normalized nutrient loads at the Vistula coast have been stable for TP (statistically insignificant decrease) and decreasing (statistically significant) for TN over the period 1995-2014 (see [24] and specifically the TP and TN trends in their figures 29 and 28, respectively).…”
Section: Relevance Of the Numerical Experimentation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%