2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water quality indicators: Comparison of a probabilistic index and a general quality index. The case of the Confederación Hidrográfica del Júcar (Spain)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, nitrate concentrations in the rivers and aquifers displayed a tendency to increase from the upstream to the downstream, except with the Júcar system midstream (also polluted), as presented by the authors in the Refs. [36,52,53].…”
Section: Nitrate Transfer From Gw Into Riversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, nitrate concentrations in the rivers and aquifers displayed a tendency to increase from the upstream to the downstream, except with the Júcar system midstream (also polluted), as presented by the authors in the Refs. [36,52,53].…”
Section: Nitrate Transfer From Gw Into Riversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, Spearman's correlation coefficient (rs) [38] was used to study the association between water quality parameters at each of the monitoring stations. PCA and Spearman's coefficient were used to detect possible water quality indicator parameters [39] in the DWSS under study. Namely, it was assumed as a hypothesis that the water quality parameters that showed the best significant correlations were those that could be suggested as water quality indicators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent survey of approaches for constructing indices (Bierman et al, 2011) cite the techniques of cluster analysis (Hargiss et al, 2008;Khalil et al, 2010;Styers et al, 2010), principal components analysis, factor analysis (Blocksom and Johnson, 2009;Leunda et al, 2009;Liou et al, 2004;Ou et al, 2010;Tran et al, 2010), discriminant analysis (Feio et al, 2009;Kane et al, 2009), and fuzzy logic (Ghosh and Mujumdar, 2010). This work has been extended to include errors in measurement of the constituent variables used to construct the water quality index (Beamonte Córdoba et al, 2010;Castoldi et al, 2009;Ghosh and Mujumdar, 2010;Sin et al, 2009;Taheriyoun et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Water quality indices have been developed and used to characterize a wide variety of phenomena including drinking water (Beamonte Córdoba et al, 2010), bioassessment (Aguiar et al 2014;Blanchet et al, 2008;Kanno et al, 2010;Stoddard et al, 2008), fresh water habitat (Pinto et al, 2009;Simaika and Samways, 2011), effect of agriculture on stream water (Justus et al, 2010;Shiels, 2010), river water quality (Feio et al, 2009;Navarro-Llácer et al, 2010), ecological condition (Jordan et al, 2010;Marchini et al, 2009;Seilheimer et al, 2009;Tran et al, 2008) and variable reduction for selection of variables to monitor (Kantoussan et al, 2010). A recent survey of approaches for constructing indices (Bierman et al, 2011) cite the techniques of cluster analysis (Hargiss et al, 2008;Khalil et al, 2010;Styers et al, 2010), principal components analysis, factor analysis (Blocksom and Johnson, 2009;Leunda et al, 2009;Liou et al, 2004;Ou et al, 2010;Tran et al, 2010), discriminant analysis (Feio et al, 2009;Kane et al, 2009), and fuzzy logic (Ghosh and Mujumdar, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%