1955
DOI: 10.2307/1933226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water Relations in Two Species of Terrestrial Mosses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

1956
1956
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous water-loss experiments on cryptogams by others have yielded similar results (Heatwole 1966, Anderson and Bourdeau 1955, Scofield and Yarman 1943, Klepper 1968). The rate of this evaporation is directly related to the water vapor gradient from the plant to the free air surrounding the plant but is inversely related to the resistance of the pathway to the diffusion of water vapor.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…Numerous water-loss experiments on cryptogams by others have yielded similar results (Heatwole 1966, Anderson and Bourdeau 1955, Scofield and Yarman 1943, Klepper 1968). The rate of this evaporation is directly related to the water vapor gradient from the plant to the free air surrounding the plant but is inversely related to the resistance of the pathway to the diffusion of water vapor.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…Conversely, air humidity may be higher in some EG stands than in DA stands (Nihlgård, 1969) providing favourable growing conditions for mosses (Frisvoll & Presto, 1997). Almost all absorbed water, and the majority of absorbed nutrients, are provided by direct precipitation or forest throughfall; only the very top of the soil is exploited (Anderson & Bourdeau, 1955;Binkley & Graham, 1981;Weber & Van Cleve, 1984;Startsev et al, 2008). A thick moss layer may not be observed in some EG forests, such as frequently thinned stands.…”
Section: (2) Understorey: An Example Of Cascade Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because mosses have no root (only short rhizoids), no or limited cuticle, and very high SLA, they rely mainly on atmospheric inputs for their water and nutrient supply. Almost all absorbed water, and the majority of absorbed nutrients, are provided by direct precipitation or forest throughfall; only the very top of the soil is exploited (Anderson & Bourdeau, 1955;Binkley & Graham, 1981;Weber & Van Cleve, 1984;Startsev et al, 2008). Moss may thus act as an intercepting layer for water and nutrients, reducing their movement and recycling.…”
Section: Synthesis (1) Spermatophytes and Forest Functioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the ectohydric non-vascular plants this is not unexpected since these are often thought to be dependent from atmospheric inputs for the bulk of their nutrients and water requirements (e.g. Anderson & Bourdeau 1955;Brown & Bates 1990). However, substrate dependency may not entirely be ruled out (Brown & Bates 1990).…”
Section: Suspended Soil Chemistry and The Distribution Of Epiphytesmentioning
confidence: 99%