2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.06.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water resistances and bonding strengths of soy-based adhesives containing different carbohydrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
51
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Linear correlation analysis showed that the correlation coefficient between Y1 and Y2 (r = 0.581) was higher than the critical value (r(0.01, 20) = 0.561) (Field 2009;Coolidge 2012), suggesting that there was a significantly positive relationship between reducing sugar content and bonding strength of SBA. This result implied that the bonding strength of SBA can be effectively enhanced via enzymolyzed polysaccharides in DSF (Chen et al 2013(Chen et al , 2014. …”
Section: Model Fittingmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Linear correlation analysis showed that the correlation coefficient between Y1 and Y2 (r = 0.581) was higher than the critical value (r(0.01, 20) = 0.561) (Field 2009;Coolidge 2012), suggesting that there was a significantly positive relationship between reducing sugar content and bonding strength of SBA. This result implied that the bonding strength of SBA can be effectively enhanced via enzymolyzed polysaccharides in DSF (Chen et al 2013(Chen et al , 2014. …”
Section: Model Fittingmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…It has been demonstrated that SBAs developed from trypsin Kalapathy et al 1995), papain, and urease (Kumar et al 2004) resulted in treated soy protein with higher hydrophobicity, lower viscosity, and better water resistance compared with untreated soy protein. Moreover, several studies have reported that the water resistances of SBAs are also influenced by carbohydrates in DSF Hunt et al 2009;Chen et al 2013) because DSF is a complicated mixture consisting of approximately 50% protein, 40% carbohydrates, and other minor components (Bainy et al 2008;Chen et al 2013). Previous studies by the authors have shown that enzymatic (Viscozyme ® L) pretreatment of the carbohydrates (e.g., polysaccharides) in DSF improved the water resistance of the SBAs as a result of the Maillard reaction that occurred between proteins and monosaccharides (Chen et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, for the five soy meal-based products reported here, some other factors may also have contributed to the different behavior between soy and cottonseed products. For example, Chen et al (2013) and Lorenz et al (2015) reported that there are many possible impacts from carbohydrate compounds on the adhesive performance of soy meal products. Therefore, we assume that the different carbohydrate profiles in our soy and cottonseed products might be a significant factor in the adhesive performance between the two types of oilseed products.…”
Section: Effect Of Tung Oil On Adhesive Strength Of Soy Meal Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of carbohydrates on the water resistance and bonding strengths of soy-based adhesives (SBAs) were studied (33) .…”
Section: Soyaprotein Adhesivementioning
confidence: 99%