2016
DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/20160911012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water retention behaviour of compacted bentonites: experimental observations and constitutive model

Abstract: Abstract. Bentonite-based materials are studied as potential barriers for the geological disposal of radioactive waste. In this context, the hydro-mechanical behaviour of the engineered barrier is first characterized by free swelling conditions followed by constant volume conditions. This paper presents an experimental study conducted in order to characterize the water retention behaviour of a compacted MX-80 bentonite/sand mixture. Then, based on observations of the material double structure and the water ret… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, the parameter values of the macrostructural retention model were determined by fitting Eq. (6) to data from: (a) free swelling tests by Dieudonné et al [11], Likos and Lu [31], Likos and Wayllace [32] and Saiyouri et al [55] for MX-80 bentonite, (b) free swelling tests by Villar [52] for FEBEX bentonite, and (c) free swelling tests by Salager et al [57] and constant load test (at constant vertical loads of 0.026, 0.55 and 0.6 MPa) by Romero [51] for Boom clay. Confined tests were not considered in this stage since the experimental values of the net mean stress developed during the tests were not available, and p could not be calculated.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Next, the parameter values of the macrostructural retention model were determined by fitting Eq. (6) to data from: (a) free swelling tests by Dieudonné et al [11], Likos and Lu [31], Likos and Wayllace [32] and Saiyouri et al [55] for MX-80 bentonite, (b) free swelling tests by Villar [52] for FEBEX bentonite, and (c) free swelling tests by Salager et al [57] and constant load test (at constant vertical loads of 0.026, 0.55 and 0.6 MPa) by Romero [51] for Boom clay. Confined tests were not considered in this stage since the experimental values of the net mean stress developed during the tests were not available, and p could not be calculated.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only recently, some authors have, however, started to analyse the effects of porosity structure on soil-water retention and have proposed suitable modelling strategies that can account for the evolution of pore size distribution (e.g. [8][9][10][11]23]). In this context, the present paper proposes a new approach to describe the influence of double porosity on soil-water retention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microstructure of bentonite has been the focus of many porosimetric and microscopic studies [2,9,30,31,34,45]. An illustration of the bentonite microstructure is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Double-porosity In Bentonitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The water retention model developed by Dieudonne et al (2016) is adopted. The model considers adsorbed water in the microstructure and capillary water in the aggregate-porosity.…”
Section: Hydromechanical Formulation For Bentonite-based Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%