1972
DOI: 10.1097/00010694-197204000-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water Retention in Soil1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
49
1
7

Year Published

1981
1981
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
49
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…A thermodynamic proof of Eq. 2, together with a schematic drawing of the e-q-P diagram is presented in Groenevelt and Bolt (1972). Equation 2 is the bridge between the relevant extensive and intensive variables.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A thermodynamic proof of Eq. 2, together with a schematic drawing of the e-q-P diagram is presented in Groenevelt and Bolt (1972). Equation 2 is the bridge between the relevant extensive and intensive variables.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies regarding non-rigid soils are usually concerned with swelling/shrinking, non-frozen, clay soils (Groenevelt and Bolt 1972;Sposito 1973;Groenevelt and Parlange 1974). The non-rigidity is then observed from the change in bulk density (mass of solids per unit bulk volume) or in void ratio (volume of pore space per unit volume of solid material).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(13) has the advantage of being applicable for the entire flow region. GROENEVELT and BOLT (1972) as: The conservation of mass (eq. 9) can then be converted into:…”
Section: Mechanica} and Energy Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overburden pressure was assumed to have a negligible effect on the volume change, and such assumptions cre- below shallow water tables [Youngs and Towner, 1970]. Although the load factor was corrected to include the effect of overburden pressure on the volume change as given by (1) [Philip, 1970;Groenevelt and Bolt, 1972], the equilibrium moisture distribution in swelling soils has not been corrected accordingly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%