“…For the Fe 2 O 3 /Fe 2 TiO 5 sample, the C 1s spectrum is deconvoluted into three peaks, attributed to C–C (284.8 eV), C–O (286.4 eV), and CO (288.1 eV) species, respectively. , By comparison, there is an additional fitted peak at 285.4 eV in the C 1s spectrum of the HEDP-Fe 2 O 3 /Fe 2 TiO 5 photoanode, originating from the C–P–O bond of the HEDP molecule. , The O 1s spectra are displayed in Figure d, wherein the Fe 2 O 3 /Fe 2 TiO 5 photoanode exhibits two kinds of oxygen species: lattice oxygen (O 2– ) for Fe 2 O 3 /Fe 2 TiO 5 (529.6 eV) and surface-adsorbed oxygen such as OH – and a water molecule (531.1 eV). , For the HEDP-Fe 2 O 3 /Fe 2 TiO 5 film, three overlapping components at 530.1, 531.3, and 532.9 eV are clearly observed, assigned to the lattice oxygen of Fe 2 O 3 /Fe 2 TiO 5 , P–O bonds, and adsorbed water, respectively. , Obviously, the presence of P–O bonds further declares the successful HEDP deposition. In Figure e, the high-resolution Fe 2P XPS of Fe 2 O 3 /Fe 2 TiO 5 and HEDP-Fe 2 O 3 /Fe 2 TiO 5 photoanodes show two spin–orbit peaks of Fe 2p 2/3 and Fe 2p 1/2 , and their binding energies are in accord with the typical values of Fe 3+ species in hematite. − Regarding the Ti 2p XPS spectra (Figure f), the characteristic peaks of Ti 2p 3/2 and Ti 2p 1/2 of both photoanodes also agree well with those of Ti 4+ species. , More notably, in comparison with the Fe 2 O 3 /Fe 2 TiO 5 sample, the HEDP-Fe 2 O 3 /Fe 2 TiO 5 photoanode exhibits an obvious positive shift in the binding energies of O 1s (O 2– species), Fe 2p, and Ti 2p peaks. The shift might be attributed to the Fermi level shift or the nonlinear response of the XPS spectrometer.…”