2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2017.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water sorption behaviour of gas shales: II. Pore size distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The formation characteristics of HFN are difficult to obtain because of the extremely low permeability and complex stress state of shale reservoirs [9,10]. Some main factors have been studied in detail in previous studies, such as the presence of clay minerals in clay-rich shales, pore size distribution, rock brittleness, viscosity of the fracturing fluid and injection rate [11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The formation characteristics of HFN are difficult to obtain because of the extremely low permeability and complex stress state of shale reservoirs [9,10]. Some main factors have been studied in detail in previous studies, such as the presence of clay minerals in clay-rich shales, pore size distribution, rock brittleness, viscosity of the fracturing fluid and injection rate [11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to these results, the interaction between HF and weak surfaces, such as BP, can be divided into two categories, namely HF cross through BP (the first row in Figure 1) or propagate along BP (the second row in Figure 1). studied in detail in previous studies, such as the presence of clay minerals in clay-rich shales, pore size distribution, rock brittleness, viscosity of the fracturing fluid and injection rate [11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The YY shale with peaks near 2 nm and 100 nm and the GZ shale with peaks near 2 nm and 10 nm are shown in Figures 7(a) and 7(c). The pore size distributions of the raw YY and GZ shale were different from those of the Barnett shale in North American shale plays and Otter-Park shale in the Horn River Basin [41,42]. It was observed that the pore size distributions of the YY shale increased significantly after slick water treatment (Figure 7(a)), especially the mesopores (Figure 7(b)).…”
Section: Geofluidsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Most water vapor adsorption experiments use an oversaturated solution in a tightly closed container to maintain one level of RH (Hu, Trautz, & Wang, 2004;Zolfaghari et al, 2017), but this has the following disadvantages: (a) it is time consuming to reach equilibrium and much space is needed for many containers; (b) it is difficult to reach the target RH by saturated salt solution, especially a low one such as 10% RH; and (c) it is disruptive to the equilibration process to take and return the samples to weigh periodically, and thus equilibration must be reestablished. In this study, the dynamic water vapor adsorption isotherm was obtained using a gravimetric water vapor adsorption analyzer (Aquadyne DVS, Quantachrome/Anton Parr).…”
Section: Water Vapor Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%