Remote Sensing for Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Hydrology XV 2013
DOI: 10.1117/12.2028669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water surface temperature profiles for the Rhine River derived from Landsat ETM+ data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean bias after correction for emissivity (−0.85 AE 0.15°C) is similar to that of Landsat ETM+ data of the research area, 6 but the original satellite dataset from several acquisition dates has a much higher variance compared to the aerial data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The mean bias after correction for emissivity (−0.85 AE 0.15°C) is similar to that of Landsat ETM+ data of the research area, 6 but the original satellite dataset from several acquisition dates has a much higher variance compared to the aerial data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…The standard deviation of the difference between remote sensing temperatures and in situ measurement increased with the pixel size in this comparison (see Fig. 6), but it is still lower than the standard deviation of the original Landsat ETM+ scenes for the Rhine River (σ ¼ 1.3°C) from a previous study, 6 which are additionally affected by the atmosphere and sensor characteristics. …”
Section: Evaluation Of Original Calibrated and Corrected Aerial Surmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations