2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water table depth forecasting in cranberry fields using two decision-tree-modeling approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bagging (bootstrap aggregating) is an ensemble technique that predicts results by generating multiple decision trees independently of each other [20]. In boosting, multiple decision trees are grown sequentially using information from existing trees [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bagging (bootstrap aggregating) is an ensemble technique that predicts results by generating multiple decision trees independently of each other [20]. In boosting, multiple decision trees are grown sequentially using information from existing trees [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three observations wells were located within the Surface type (Wells B-b, B-c, and B-d at Site B, Figure 1), and three within the Natural type (Wells A-e and A-g at Site A; Well B-g at Site B, Figure 1). Over the 4 years, a total of 24 time series of WTDs met the characteristics of water table management required to be classified Bottom (8), Surface (8), or Natural (8). On an annual basis, 10 time series were kept for 2017, 7 for 2018, 3 for 2019, and 4 for 2020.…”
Section: Soils Sites and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of such tools actively relies on developing and incorporating real-time predictive and adaptive models of distribution patterns of water table depth (WTD). This kind of real-time water management has been studied widely through monitoring or modelling of soil water content or status [2,3], soil matric potential [4][5][6], crop parameters [7], and water table depth (WTD) [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model was built with separate combinations of input variables. Lag times of input variables were generated by means of the sliding window method (Brédy et al, 2020), which allowed us to restructure the time series of P, ET 0 , and SMP as a supervised learning problem by using a size of the lag (d) equal to 168 h. This lag size was chosen to consider the influence of the SMP values at position T1 over the previous 168-h time period on the predictions. Therefore, we constructed the ML-based model maps an input window of width d into an individual output value y.…”
Section: Ml-based Model Development Input Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extraterrestrial radiation for the daily and hourly periods were estimated using the equations of Allen et al (1998), which for each day of the year and for different latitudes, can be estimated from the solar constant, G sc = 4.92 MJm −2 d −1 . Because of computational time constraints, the number of decision trees (ntree) was set to 200; as reported by Rodriguez-Galiano et al (2014) and (Brédy et al, 2020), the gain in accuracy is negligible for ntree > 200.…”
Section: Ml-based Model Development Input Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%