2021
DOI: 10.1111/oik.08638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water the odds? Spring rainfall and emergence‐related seed traits drive plant recruitment

Abstract: Recruitment of new individuals from seed is a critical component of plant community assembly and reassembly, especially in the context of ecosystem disturbance and recovery. While frameworks typically aim to predict how communities will be filtered on the basis of traits influencing established plant responses to the environment, assembly from seed is more complex: the responses of seeds (affected by dormancy and germination function) and establishing plants (affected by root and leaf function) can both influe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Understanding what drives spatial variation in community assembly processes is a key goal in ecology (Myers et al, 2013; Weiher et al, 2011), with important implications for understanding the impact of anthropogenic climate change on biodiversity (Lavergne et al, 2010; Mokany & Ferrier, 2011) and informing ecosystem management (Wainwright et al, 2018). Recently, there has been a growing recognition that a community is the result of the differential growth and survival of organisms throughout their lifetimes (ontogeny; Larson & Funk, 2016; Máliš et al, 2016), and that therefore each ontogenetic stage is a pathway by which assembly processes may interact to influence overall community structure (Larson et al, 2021; Lasky et al, 2015). Despite decades of research on the role of ontogenetic variation in influencing forest diversity (Clark & Clark, 1984; Connell et al, 1984; Grubb, 1977), and advances in identifying relevant regeneration traits and filters (Larson & Funk, 2016), ontogeny has not been explicitly integrated into modern community assembly frameworks (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding what drives spatial variation in community assembly processes is a key goal in ecology (Myers et al, 2013; Weiher et al, 2011), with important implications for understanding the impact of anthropogenic climate change on biodiversity (Lavergne et al, 2010; Mokany & Ferrier, 2011) and informing ecosystem management (Wainwright et al, 2018). Recently, there has been a growing recognition that a community is the result of the differential growth and survival of organisms throughout their lifetimes (ontogeny; Larson & Funk, 2016; Máliš et al, 2016), and that therefore each ontogenetic stage is a pathway by which assembly processes may interact to influence overall community structure (Larson et al, 2021; Lasky et al, 2015). Despite decades of research on the role of ontogenetic variation in influencing forest diversity (Clark & Clark, 1984; Connell et al, 1984; Grubb, 1977), and advances in identifying relevant regeneration traits and filters (Larson & Funk, 2016), ontogeny has not been explicitly integrated into modern community assembly frameworks (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was unfortunate for at least some seedlings, and amplified by the intense drought in summer 2018 and 2019 (cf. Hari et al, 2020; Larson et al, 2021; Orrock et al, 2023). The lasting negative effect on persistence and FCS on the southern slope suggests a legacy effect of adverse weather conditions after sowing as observed by other studies (Groves et al, 2020; Stuble et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B1B, middle panel). Both metrics were derived from experiments in Larson et al (2021), where seeds were buried in a protected area with minimal signs of seed loss to external factors.…”
Section: Data Inputsmentioning
confidence: 99%