1966
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/17.2.344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water Transport in Isolated Maize Roots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

1967
1967
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These values are slightly lower than those obtained by House and Findlay (1966) Ginzburg (1964a, 1964b) have shown that there is a decrease in the hydraulic conductivity of algal cells with increases in solute concentration. They suggested that the decrease in permeability resulted from a shrinking of the membrane caused by a decrease in chemical potential of the surrounding water.…”
Section: (B) Effects Of Osmotic Pressure On Permeabilitycontrasting
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These values are slightly lower than those obtained by House and Findlay (1966) Ginzburg (1964a, 1964b) have shown that there is a decrease in the hydraulic conductivity of algal cells with increases in solute concentration. They suggested that the decrease in permeability resulted from a shrinking of the membrane caused by a decrease in chemical potential of the surrounding water.…”
Section: (B) Effects Of Osmotic Pressure On Permeabilitycontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…If in the experiments of van Overbeek (1942) the osmotic pressure measured at the cut stump was lower than that in the root tips, then it need not mean that there had been a non-osmotic uptake of water, only that some of the salt which caused the entry of water in the lower part of the root was removed before the fluid left the root. The data of House and Findlay (1966) show a linear relation of flow to concentration differential and a positive intercept on the ordinate which implies that there may have been non-osmotic uptake of water. If there had been any re-absorption of salt from the xylem between the location of the entry of water and the cut stump, the measured concentration differential would be lower than the actual differential and would have caused the curve to show a non-osmotic uptake of water that did not really exist.…”
Section: (D) "Active" Water Uptakementioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nitrate also enhanced the exudation volumes relative to other forms of nitrogen (27,28). Xylem exudation is a function of the osmotic pressure difference between the xylem sap and the root-bathing solution and it also depends on the hydraulic conductivity of the root tissue (15,22). For the observed difference in exudation (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%