1986
DOI: 10.1021/es00153a001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water treatment processes. III. Removing dissolved inorganic contaminants from water

Abstract: Dissolved inorganic contaminants in water can he cationic, anionic, or neutral forms of ions, atoms, or molecules of any element in the periodic table.All contaminant ions and most dissolved non-ions a Relatively insensitive to flow and total dissolved soli Low effluent concentration possible In reverse osmosis, bacteria and particles are removed as well DisadvantagesHigh capital and operating costs High level of pretreatment required Membranes are prone to fouling Rnim stream is M W % of feed flw

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…9 Similar selective adsorption performance has also been reported by Zhang et al using superhydrophobic nanoporous polydivinylbenzene. 10 Due to their excellent selective adsorption performance, fast adsorption kinetics, good working capacity and recyclable use performance, these materials have great advantages over those traditional absorbent materials such as active carbons, 11,12 which suffer from a number of drawbacks, including slow adsorption kinetics, poor selectivity and limited working capacity. Owing to the global scale of severe water pollution arising from oil spills and industrial organic pollutants, the creation of efficient absorbent materials for separation and removal of oils or organic pollutants from water should be of great importance to address environmental issues.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Similar selective adsorption performance has also been reported by Zhang et al using superhydrophobic nanoporous polydivinylbenzene. 10 Due to their excellent selective adsorption performance, fast adsorption kinetics, good working capacity and recyclable use performance, these materials have great advantages over those traditional absorbent materials such as active carbons, 11,12 which suffer from a number of drawbacks, including slow adsorption kinetics, poor selectivity and limited working capacity. Owing to the global scale of severe water pollution arising from oil spills and industrial organic pollutants, the creation of efficient absorbent materials for separation and removal of oils or organic pollutants from water should be of great importance to address environmental issues.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a variety of methods currently available for removal of arsenic from contaminated water. Conventional technologies, such as coagulation, do not discriminate between arsenic and other elements and involve alteration of the water chemistry and addition of other chemicals (7). Current technologies, such as activated alumina sorption, polymeric anion exchange, and polymeric ligand exchange (6), are more effective for As(V) than As(III), and most commonly used methods require prior oxidation of all of the As(III) to As(V) (10,30).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for detection of multiple toxic metals with near-equal sorption affinity present in a sample, further research is needed to achieve preseparation of the metals prior to feeding in the mini-column. [30][31][32] The presence of common cations (Na þ and Ca 2þ ) in the sample at much higher concentration compared with trace toxic metals does not interfere with the detection technique. Calcium, though a divalent cation, has a poor affinity for the HFO binding sites and also forms a weak metal-hydroxy complex.…”
Section: Shortcomings and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%