2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.05.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water treatment technologies for the remediation of naphthenic acids in oil sands process-affected water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, the equilibrium adsorption capacity was observed to decay exponentially from 179.4 to 37.9 mg/g as the concentration of NaCl was increased from 0 to 40 mmol/L. This drastic reduction in performance would certainly require consideration when implementing QCHA as NA adsorbents from OSPW due to the high concentration of monovalent and divalent salts …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, the equilibrium adsorption capacity was observed to decay exponentially from 179.4 to 37.9 mg/g as the concentration of NaCl was increased from 0 to 40 mmol/L. This drastic reduction in performance would certainly require consideration when implementing QCHA as NA adsorbents from OSPW due to the high concentration of monovalent and divalent salts …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the many contaminants present in OSPW, a very diverse group of organic carboxylates, collectively recognized as naphthenic acids (NAs), have been identified as being the most acutely toxic . NAs are typically present in OSPW in concentrations ranging from 40–70 mg/L . NAs require a considerably long period of time for complete degradation and are also well‐known contributors to the corrosion of process equipment .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some components of OSPW are well understood: trace elements including metals, semimetals, and metalloids (Nix and Martin ; Siwik et al ; Bicalho et al ; Donner et al ), salts and ammonia (COSIA ), and suspended solids (El‐Din et al ; COSIA ; McQueen, Hendrikse et al ). However, the complexity of the organics in OSPW creates a practical challenge for determining treatment methods (Headley et al ; Pereira et al 2013; Goff et al ; Brown and Ulrich ; Quinlan and Tam ; Wilde et al ; Ajaero et al ), in addition to estimating potential risks (West et al ; Huang et al ). The estimation of potential risk is further supported through an existing understanding of chemical properties such as the propensity for bioaccumulation (Zhang et al ; Morandi et al ).…”
Section: Workhop Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proper handling of these large volumes of OSPW is a major challenge for the oil sands industry. To remove OAs from OSPW, several methods have been studied, including biodegradation, catalytic decarboxylation (using Ag 2 O), membrane separation, and ozonation (Azad et al, 2013;Gamal El-Din et al, 2011;Iranmanesh et al, 2014;Quinlan and Tam, 2015;Scarlett et al, 2012, Zhang et al, 2006. These methods are effective in removal of OAs from wastewater, but are considered to be expensive, so their use is generally limited (Iranmanesh et al, 2014;Scott et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%