2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00271-010-0213-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water use, crop coefficients, and irrigation management criteria for camelina production in arid regions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Crop maturity occurred in mid-April. Because irrigation was terminated in early March, total seasonal ET only varied from a high of 371 to a low of 276 (Hunsaker et al 2011). Unlike the western Nebraska experiments above, seed yield response was not correlated with seasonal ET and WUE was about 0.33 kg m -3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Crop maturity occurred in mid-April. Because irrigation was terminated in early March, total seasonal ET only varied from a high of 371 to a low of 276 (Hunsaker et al 2011). Unlike the western Nebraska experiments above, seed yield response was not correlated with seasonal ET and WUE was about 0.33 kg m -3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Aiken et al 2011). In Arizona, USA, French et al (2009) and Hunsaker et al (2011) applied surface irrigation to study camelina's water use and yield response to irrigation in an arid environment. In that experiment (2006)(2007), a fall-planted camelina (cv.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gesch et al (2014) confirmed also the agronomic viability of relay-cropping of soybean with winter camelina compared with respective mono-crops full-season soybean. Furthermore, in a water limited environment for dual cropping systems, the low water use (WU) of camelina would benefit the subsequent crop (Gesch and Johnson, 2015;Hunsaker et al, 2011).…”
Section: Rotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Little information exists about soils where camelina is grown; therefore, it was not possible to evaluate territory suitability for its production, and a large portion of the national soils were classified as without information (Table 4). Chromic Luvisol and Haplic Kastanozem were considered to be the best soils for camelina development, as the average production in these cases was 2049 kg·ha −1 [34] and 1913 kg·ha −1 [15,17], respectively.…”
Section: Edaphic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%