2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water View Imagery: Perception and evaluation of urban waterscapes worldwide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study adopted this as a parameter to explore whether water bodies and their re ections can increase the information content of scenery. Previous studies revealed that the number of xations indicates how viewers tend to view objects (7,41). In this study, the PVA was used as a parameter to measure how often the viewer consciously or unconsciously focused on an object.…”
Section: Experiments Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study adopted this as a parameter to explore whether water bodies and their re ections can increase the information content of scenery. Previous studies revealed that the number of xations indicates how viewers tend to view objects (7,41). In this study, the PVA was used as a parameter to measure how often the viewer consciously or unconsciously focused on an object.…”
Section: Experiments Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to quantitative definitions, some progress was made since [59]. Several studies concentrate on one specific landscape element, e.g., walking path geometry [27] (having found that people tend to prefer curvy paths), oppressiveness due to building height [40], skyline impression [60], visual quality of urban water landscapes [61,62], and building exteriors [63]. Combined approaches include mostly landscape aesthetics indicators, e.g., [29], who developed beauty indexes and also distinguished landscape type; the morphologic scenic beauty estimation model of [64]; an aesthetic assessment approach [65]; and modelling of the aesthetics of urban-rural fringes [66].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of landscape aesthetics began in the late 1960s [ 25 , 26 , 27 ]. The research methods are divided into subjective paradigm (based on perception and public preference) and objective paradigm (based on landscape metrics to evaluate the objective visual value quality of landscape) [ 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ]. With the development of landscape aesthetics research, nowadays, landscape aesthetics evaluation mainly relies on spatial, psychological, and physiological perspectives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%