2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-020-06390-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water vulnerability of coastal aquifers using AHP and parametric models: methodological overview and a case study assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, some models have been used in order to assess the groundwater vulnerability to pollution, such as the DRASTIC model (Chukwuma et al, 2023; Haied et al, 2021; Liang et al, 2016). Previous works, which are related to the Mahdia‐Ksour Essef aquifer study, used the DRASTIC model (Nasri et al, 2021; Saidi, 2011) in order to investigate the groundwater vulnerability. These studies confirmed the contribution of the agricultural activities and salt water intrusion to the groundwater pollution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, some models have been used in order to assess the groundwater vulnerability to pollution, such as the DRASTIC model (Chukwuma et al, 2023; Haied et al, 2021; Liang et al, 2016). Previous works, which are related to the Mahdia‐Ksour Essef aquifer study, used the DRASTIC model (Nasri et al, 2021; Saidi, 2011) in order to investigate the groundwater vulnerability. These studies confirmed the contribution of the agricultural activities and salt water intrusion to the groundwater pollution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It calculates each index and arranges the indices through a decision-making method, and then estimates the probability of SWI potential for various hydrogeological settings by numerical modeling [30]. These parameters are based on the physical properties that can directly influence SWI [31,43]. Once the distribution of vulnerability to SWI is computed using the GALDIT index score, the next step is to determine the spatial extent of GW vulnerability to SWI in the areas of concern.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique involves locating and selecting suitable sites for recharge, as well as constructing a hydraulic barrier to prevent seawater flow towards freshwater aquifers. Identifying appropriate zones for GW artificial recharge is typically done by combining different thematic maps with assigned ranking values, such as geology, geomorphology, hydrological soil, runoff, surface slope, and land use [43,48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars have combined different evaluation objects and theoretical connotations to construct corresponding indicators, and they used a variety of methods to evaluate water resources vulnerability. In the application of evaluation methods, weight evaluation methods, such as entropy weight method [28], projection pursuit method [29], analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method [30] are used more frequently. In addition, principal component analysis (PCA) [31,32], technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) [33], rough set cloud [34], connection entropy approach [35], expert-based model [36] and other quantitative methods are also used in the assessment of water resources vulnerability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%