1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0257-8972(96)02995-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Waterjet roughened surface analysis and bond strength

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…9 The effect of different types of cleaning and pretreatment of metallic substrates, as well as application procedures, has been thoroughly described elsewhere. 31,[149][150][151][152] The adhesion between an organic coating and a metal substrate or pigments may also be improved by means of coupling agents that create stronger interfacial interaction (covalent bonds) between the coating and the media. These coupling agents are often referred to as adhesion promoters, and their role in improving adhesion of organic coatings to metal substrates has been extensively reviewed.…”
Section: Adhesionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 The effect of different types of cleaning and pretreatment of metallic substrates, as well as application procedures, has been thoroughly described elsewhere. 31,[149][150][151][152] The adhesion between an organic coating and a metal substrate or pigments may also be improved by means of coupling agents that create stronger interfacial interaction (covalent bonds) between the coating and the media. These coupling agents are often referred to as adhesion promoters, and their role in improving adhesion of organic coatings to metal substrates has been extensively reviewed.…”
Section: Adhesionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In WJ peening, a high velocity waterjet impinges the substrate and generates a surface pressure distribution that induces localized plastic deformation (Daniewicz and Cummings, 1999;Tonshoff et al, 1995). Though WJ peening generally does not change the surface texture of the substrate (Arola et al, 2002;Colosimo et al, 2000;Ramulu et al, 2000;Salko, 1984;Wagner, 1999), an increase in roughness can arise in treating substrates with low yield strength, or under operating conditions comprised of high jet pressures and long exposure times (Colosimo et al, 2000;Daniewicz and Cummings, 1999;Hirano et al, 1996;Knapp and Taylor, 1996). Residual stresses invoked by the surface deformation are dependent on the peening conditions but are primarily compressive in nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive work hardening of the surface has been shown to decrease the surface roughness with extended treatment times in grit blasting and WJ peening operations (Hirano et al, 1996;Knapp and Taylor, 1996;Mellali et al, 1997;Tonshoff et al, 1995;Wigren, 1987). The traverse rates used in the AWJ treatmens resulted in exposure times that were likely insufficient to reach saturation or over-hardening.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They proposed that increased adhesion strength between the coating and substrate may be a result of increased anchoring features and increased roughness. Knapp et al [11] reported the plasma sprayed MCrAlY coating-substrate bond strength as high as 70 MPa after roughening the Inconel 718 and Mar-M 509 substrates by the waterjet process. Bobzin et al [12] compared the adhesion strength between a PTWA low carbon steel coating on Al-6060 surfaces geometrically cut and high-pressure waterjet roughened.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%