2019
DOI: 10.5958/0974-8172.2019.00016.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Waterless pheromone trap-efficient alternative to water basin trap for sugarcane early shoot borer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, since a presently recommended action threshold based on YSB moth catches in pheromone traps is about 25 moths per trap per week [24] which is apparently based on moth catch estimates correlated from Funnel trap, there is scope for locally refining the applicable threshold for moth catches if Delta traps are used, to factor in the differential moth catch efficiency. Further, since past estimates of economic benefit of pheromone-based mass trapping technology were apparently made with Funnel traps [13], there is scope to improve the cost competitiveness of mass trapping of YSB moths as an option, since replacing with Delta variants would obviously be both more efficient and only slightly costlier than Funnel trap, since similar benefit has been shown in the case of another Crambid-the sugarcane early shoot borer [26]. The present results have therefore opened up the good potential for trap design choice as a factor in promoting pheromone-based mass trapping strategy as promising eco-safe alternative to the use of synthetic chemical insecticides for YSB management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, since a presently recommended action threshold based on YSB moth catches in pheromone traps is about 25 moths per trap per week [24] which is apparently based on moth catch estimates correlated from Funnel trap, there is scope for locally refining the applicable threshold for moth catches if Delta traps are used, to factor in the differential moth catch efficiency. Further, since past estimates of economic benefit of pheromone-based mass trapping technology were apparently made with Funnel traps [13], there is scope to improve the cost competitiveness of mass trapping of YSB moths as an option, since replacing with Delta variants would obviously be both more efficient and only slightly costlier than Funnel trap, since similar benefit has been shown in the case of another Crambid-the sugarcane early shoot borer [26]. The present results have therefore opened up the good potential for trap design choice as a factor in promoting pheromone-based mass trapping strategy as promising eco-safe alternative to the use of synthetic chemical insecticides for YSB management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For methyl eugenolbased fruit fly trapping, the use of cylindrical white jar traps in combination with vial-wick dispenser has been found promising, while for cucurbit vegetables, there is scope for alternative trap types, pheromone blend and lure dispenser deployment 2015;Divya et al, 2011;Sithanantham, 2011;Suganthy et al, 2014). Further, it has been clarified that while the sleeve (funnel) trap is still efficient for trapping noctuid moths like Helicoverpa, it is found to be clearly inefficient for the crambid moth-Scirpophaga incertulas in rice compared to the improved delta traps, with additional access vents (Delta-Plus), which are found to be also superior to both sleeve traps and water basin traps for Leucinodes orbonalis in brinjal (Prabakaran et al, 2017) and Chilo infuscatellus in sugarcane (Prabakaran et al, 2018).…”
Section: At National Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%