2017 IEEE 7th International Advance Computing Conference (IACC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/iacc.2017.0145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Watershed and Clustering Based Segmentation of Chromosome Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Manohar et al 57 compared the performance of FCM and watershed transform in chromosome segmentation using publicly available M-FISH database. The overall accuracy was 94% and 92% for FCM and watershed transform respectively.…”
Section: Sayed and Hassanienmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manohar et al 57 compared the performance of FCM and watershed transform in chromosome segmentation using publicly available M-FISH database. The overall accuracy was 94% and 92% for FCM and watershed transform respectively.…”
Section: Sayed and Hassanienmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of chromosomal karyotyping is performed by pairing the chromosomes according to the similarity between them. The chromosomes are classified in one of the four classes according to the location of the centromere: metacentric, submetacentric, subtelocentric, and acrocentric [4] [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the identification of the centromere, the centromere positions can be calculated by convex and concave property 10,12 , and the pixel information of the chromosomes 6,7,13 . The centromere can also be detected by applying multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization images [14][15][16][17] . Since the morphology of chromosomes is diverse, the conventional methods cannot easily identify different morphologies of chromosomes, limiting the identification accuracy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%