2002
DOI: 10.1029/2001wr000365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Watershed optimization of best management practices using AnnAGNPS and a genetic algorithm

Abstract: [1] An optimization algorithm linked with a nonpoint source (NPS) pollution model can be used to optimize NPS pollution control strategies on a field-by-field basis in a watershed by maximizing NPS pollution reduction and net monetary return. In this paper a methodology is described which integrated a genetic algorithm (GA) (an optimization algorithm) with a continuous simulation, watershed-scale, NPS pollution model, Annualized Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution model (AnnAGNPS) to optimize the selection… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
101
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
101
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, EAs belong to a class of stochastic optimization methods and are well suited for approximating solutions to complex combinatorial problems (see, e.g., Deb 2001;Forrest 1993). Optimization methods falling under the broader EA classification have been successfully applied to integrated watershed modeling systems (Srivastava et al 2002;Veith et al 2003;Bekele and Nicklow 2005;Lant et al 2005;Muleta and Nicklow 2005;Arabi et al 2006;Whittaker et al 2007;Jha et al forthcoming;Rabotyagov et al 2010). To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the impact of land-use changes exogenous to optimization on the efficient frontier of tradeoffs between multiple water quality objectives (N and P) and the cost of conservation investments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, EAs belong to a class of stochastic optimization methods and are well suited for approximating solutions to complex combinatorial problems (see, e.g., Deb 2001;Forrest 1993). Optimization methods falling under the broader EA classification have been successfully applied to integrated watershed modeling systems (Srivastava et al 2002;Veith et al 2003;Bekele and Nicklow 2005;Lant et al 2005;Muleta and Nicklow 2005;Arabi et al 2006;Whittaker et al 2007;Jha et al forthcoming;Rabotyagov et al 2010). To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the impact of land-use changes exogenous to optimization on the efficient frontier of tradeoffs between multiple water quality objectives (N and P) and the cost of conservation investments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…또한 시험포나 경작지에서 평가된 최적관리기법에 의한 비점오염원의 저감 효과는 다른 지점이나 유역에 적 용하기 위해서나 혹은 유역 단위에서의 저감 효과를 분석 하기 위해서는 최적관리기법에 의한 비점오염원의 정량화 가 필요하다 (Jang et al, 2010;Lee et al, 2014). 볏짚에 의한 지표피복 등과 같은 최적관리기법에 대한 평가를 위해서는 모니터링뿐만 아니라, 수문 모형에 의한 평가도 필요하다 (Bishop et al, 2005;Jang et al, 2010;Kim et al, 2006;Lee et al, 2014;Lee et al, 2012;Lee et al, 2000;Maringanti et al, 2009;Maringanti et al, 2008;Park et al, 2014;Srivastava et al, 2002). 2 )가 0.91로 나타났 으며, USLE P 인자를 추정하기 위한 회귀식(식 (1))과 수 문 모형을 통한 볏짚매트에 의한 유사량 저감 모의 방법을 제안한 바 있다 (Jang et al, 2010 (Ahn et al, 2012;Park et al, 2013;Park et al, 2008).…”
unclassified
“…Economic formulation has been only limited to off-site benefits [Arabi et al, 2006] and implementation cost of conservation practices [Veith et al, 2004;Arabi et al, 2006;Maringanti et al, 2009]. In addition, fewer efforts were taken to improve convergence of the optimization methods [Srivastava, 2002]. The primary goal of this study is to present an integrated simulation-optimization framework to identify the set of optimal types and locations of NPS pollution control practices at the watershed scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%