2002
DOI: 10.2307/3088419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Watershed Partnerships and the Emergence of Collective Action Institutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
379
1
14

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 404 publications
(403 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
9
379
1
14
Order By: Relevance
“…They adopt a problem-solving attitude, i.e., a state of mind in which they focus on long-term goals such as the creation of value, better projects and a general increase in welfare (Scharpf 1988(Scharpf , 2006, independent of individual short-term policy success. This is emphasized by the literature on collaborative institutions and policy making (Leach et al 2002;Thomson and Perry 2006;Lubell et al 2010), adaptive (Crona and Parker 2012) or collaborative governance (Ansell and Gash 2008), collective action institutions (Lubell et al 2002), or deliberative policy making (Choi and Robertson 2014). Independently of whether all forum participants can offer the same resources to others, actors contribute to the problem-solving process with their specific resources such as expertise or moderation of their individual preferences.…”
Section: Solving Policy Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They adopt a problem-solving attitude, i.e., a state of mind in which they focus on long-term goals such as the creation of value, better projects and a general increase in welfare (Scharpf 1988(Scharpf , 2006, independent of individual short-term policy success. This is emphasized by the literature on collaborative institutions and policy making (Leach et al 2002;Thomson and Perry 2006;Lubell et al 2010), adaptive (Crona and Parker 2012) or collaborative governance (Ansell and Gash 2008), collective action institutions (Lubell et al 2002), or deliberative policy making (Choi and Robertson 2014). Independently of whether all forum participants can offer the same resources to others, actors contribute to the problem-solving process with their specific resources such as expertise or moderation of their individual preferences.…”
Section: Solving Policy Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If land managers do not perceive these benefits they will not cooperate, regardless of which benefits may 'objectively' exist (Lubell et al 2002). Tangible benefits can be monetary, e.g.…”
Section: Overcoming Challenges To Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, studies on the contribution of expert knowledge to policymaking (Verdun, 1999) or the diffusion of policies across borders focus on new policies coming into existence. Concerns about access to the policymaking process (O'Toole and Meier, 2004a), fairness in networked governance or control of scarce environmental resources (Lubell et al, 2002) have as their primary focus outcomes concerned with governance. These are in contrast with management studies that examine the effectiveness and efficiency of outcomes in networked settings (Provan and Milward, 1995).…”
Section: Policy Implementation Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%