2014
DOI: 10.1353/jjp.2014.0006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Watsuji’s Balancing Act: Changes in his Understanding of Individuality and Totality from 1937 to 1949

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sevilla ( 2014a , p. 112) notes that this account is somewhat puzzling: ‘But what does this self-awareness actually accomplish? Why take the detour towards individuality, if only to negate the individual again to realize totality?’ Sevilla ( 2014a , p. 105) believes that one should look to the third volume of Rinrigaku to resolve the ambiguities in the account of double negation contained in the first volume; if we do so, he argues, we can appreciate that ‘individuality … guides social change by intuiting how the totality ought to be.’ It is clear, then, that what troubles Sevilla ( 2014a ) in Rinrigaku’s first volume is that, in insisting that individuality be negated in the interest of totality, Watsuji backgrounds the question of whether the demands of totality are justifiable.…”
Section: Individualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sevilla ( 2014a , p. 112) notes that this account is somewhat puzzling: ‘But what does this self-awareness actually accomplish? Why take the detour towards individuality, if only to negate the individual again to realize totality?’ Sevilla ( 2014a , p. 105) believes that one should look to the third volume of Rinrigaku to resolve the ambiguities in the account of double negation contained in the first volume; if we do so, he argues, we can appreciate that ‘individuality … guides social change by intuiting how the totality ought to be.’ It is clear, then, that what troubles Sevilla ( 2014a ) in Rinrigaku’s first volume is that, in insisting that individuality be negated in the interest of totality, Watsuji backgrounds the question of whether the demands of totality are justifiable.…”
Section: Individualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sevilla ( 2014a ) expresses a legitimate concern; but we think we need not look so far as the third volume of Rinrigaku to address it. Specifically, we think that, in arguing that ethics demands that the individual, having negated totality, be negated and return to it, Rinrigaku has in mind not just any society, but the case of ningen sonzai (relational existence) in which ningen (humans) are truly ningen .…”
Section: Individualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, the balance between individuality and totality as reflected in the “shape” of the movement of double‐negation and the functions of individuality and totality (particularly surrounding social change) has shifted erratically from the pre‐war to the wartime to the post‐war volumes of Ethics (as discussed in Sevilla ). This is something that directly involves the Buddhism‐influenced notion of emptiness.…”
Section: Shifts and Dilemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steve Bein has partially translated this book as Purifying Zen: Watsuji Tetsurô's Shamon Dôgen (2011). This book may have single-handedly rescued Dôgen from obscurity, and can be said to be one of Watsuji's most significant contributions to Buddhism (Sevilla 2013;M€ uller 2009). Other works on Buddhism include The Practical Philosophy of Primitive Buddhism (Genshi Bukkyô no jissen tetsugaku, 1927), Further Studies on the History of Japanese Spirit (Zoku Nihon seishinshi kenkyû, 1935), and his last book, The Early Development of Buddhist Philosophy (Bukkyô tetsugaku no saisho no tenkai, posthumously published).…”
Section: Retracing Watsuji's Buddhismmentioning
confidence: 99%