2022
DOI: 10.3390/cli10010002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wave Analysis for Offshore Aquaculture Projects: A Case Study for the Eastern Mediterranean Sea

Abstract: The investigation of wave climate is of primary concern for the successful implementation of offshore aquaculture systems as waves can cause significant loads on them. Up until now, site selection and design (or selection) of offshore cage system structures on extended sea areas do not seem to follow any specific guidelines. This paper presents a novel methodology for the identification of favorable sites for offshore aquaculture development in an extended sea area based on two important technical factors: (i)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the complex morphology of the Aegean Sea, the correlation obtained for significant wave height data from ERA5 was >0.95 with a bias of 0.03 m. The correlation for the energy period from ERA5 was also >0.85. A good agreement between the in situ measurement data of Greek and Italian buoys and the ERA5 reanalysis dataset was found for the Eastern Mediterranean by Karathanasi et al (2022) [40], and the correlation for significant wave height (peak period) was >0.95 (>0.80) with a bias of 0.027 m (0.239 s). Moreover, Abu Zed et al (2022) [43] stated that ERA5 is more suitable in the Southeast Mediterranean Sea.…”
Section: Data Usedmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Despite the complex morphology of the Aegean Sea, the correlation obtained for significant wave height data from ERA5 was >0.95 with a bias of 0.03 m. The correlation for the energy period from ERA5 was also >0.85. A good agreement between the in situ measurement data of Greek and Italian buoys and the ERA5 reanalysis dataset was found for the Eastern Mediterranean by Karathanasi et al (2022) [40], and the correlation for significant wave height (peak period) was >0.95 (>0.80) with a bias of 0.027 m (0.239 s). Moreover, Abu Zed et al (2022) [43] stated that ERA5 is more suitable in the Southeast Mediterranean Sea.…”
Section: Data Usedmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…However, the outputs of these global or regional hindcast datasets typically have relatively large spatial and temporal resolutions, which may not offer sufficient predictive accuracy for the selected fish farm sites. Karathanasi, et al [40] quantitatively compared the statistical distribution differences and fitting performance of hindcast datasets from ERA5 and wave buoy measurement data in the Mediterranean region. The comparison by Karathanasi et al [40] revealed that the hindcast dataset had better predictions for H s when compared to T p , and the prediction accuracy was notably influenced by spatial location.…”
Section: Data Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Karathanasi, et al [40] quantitatively compared the statistical distribution differences and fitting performance of hindcast datasets from ERA5 and wave buoy measurement data in the Mediterranean region. The comparison by Karathanasi et al [40] revealed that the hindcast dataset had better predictions for H s when compared to T p , and the prediction accuracy was notably influenced by spatial location.…”
Section: Data Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%