1998
DOI: 10.1007/bf02392586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wave breaking for nonlinear nonlocal shallow water equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
809
0
10

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,322 publications
(824 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
809
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…(1.4) does not change sign, the Cauchy problem admits global solution for certain initial values [3,5,6], whereas solutions may blow up if their initial momentum density m 0 changes sign [3,4,5,6]. The existence of global weak solutions was investigated in [25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1.4) does not change sign, the Cauchy problem admits global solution for certain initial values [3,5,6], whereas solutions may blow up if their initial momentum density m 0 changes sign [3,4,5,6]. The existence of global weak solutions was investigated in [25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again the functionh is rescaled, and the system restarted. This construction is performed for each ξ ∈ R. As the system of ordinary differential equations is discontinuous, the global existence proof requires careful estimates; see Lemmas 5,6,8,[10][11][12][13]16.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pattern of blow-up is known [10]: the solution remains continuous while the derivative u x tends to minus infinity at the blow-up point. For this reason, the blow-up for the CH equation is often characterized as wave breaking, and we will use this term extensively in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We once again refer to [22,43] for details. These comments imply that the well-known fact that smooth solutions to the Camassa-Holm equation can develop singularities in finite time [13,15,36] is not due to the lack of local conserved quantities, as suspected for instance in [36]. Rather, the point is that the local conserved quantities do not guarantee the existence of a priori bounds for the first derivative of the solutions u(x, t) to the CH equation.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, we change our viewpoint, from thinking of the CH equation (63) as a differential equation for u(x, t), to considering (63) as an integro-differential equation for m. This approach has proved to be crucial for the analytic study of the CH equation: it has been used to determine whether solutions to CH are global in time or represent breaking waves [13,15,36], and it appears prominently in Lenells' construction of conservation laws [33], in the study of (multi)peakon dynamics and weak solutions [5,10,14], in the scattering/inverse scattering approach to CH [4,5,17], and also in a rigorous proof that the "least action principie" holds for CH [16].…”
Section: We Provide Explicit Formulae For the Functions U(xtx) M(xmentioning
confidence: 99%