2002
DOI: 10.5589/m02-031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wave height and wind direction from the HF coastal ocean surface radar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Barrick et al 1974) or wave height (cf. Heron and Prytz 2002). Gurgel et al (2006) provided an empirical method to estimate the ocean wave spectrum from the second-order sidebands, that is extended to the directional spectrum when information from two stations are available.…”
Section: Wind Speed and Direction Estimation From Hf Radarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barrick et al 1974) or wave height (cf. Heron and Prytz 2002). Gurgel et al (2006) provided an empirical method to estimate the ocean wave spectrum from the second-order sidebands, that is extended to the directional spectrum when information from two stations are available.…”
Section: Wind Speed and Direction Estimation From Hf Radarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If one assumes that a system consists of two radar sites in order to produce surface current maps, then at each point on the sea surface there are two determinations of first-order ratio and, theoretically (with no noise) there is a closed solution for the dominant direction of the Bragg waves. For waves with wavelength 10-20m this represents the wind direction except only in conditions of rapid wind shifts, when a settling time of about half an hour has to be considered [7]. People are having reasonable success with the determination of wind direction from dual radar systems, although from an operational point of view there is still a need to validate the product in the local setting.…”
Section: Surface Currentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, acquisition of these parameters in the fleld presents a signiflcant challenge due to the variability and hostility of the coastal environment. A variety of methods have previously been used to extract wave height information including in situ instrimientation such as wave buoys, pressure transducers or manometers (i.e., Grace, 1978), wave staffs, and capacitance and resistance probes (Whittenbury, Huber, and Newell, 1959) and shore-based remote techniques such as visual estimation or measurement (BahsUie and Carter, 1984;Patterson and Blair, 1983), highfrequency (HF) radar (Heron and Prytz, 2002;Wyatt, 1988), and single and stereo camera imagery (e.g., Bechle and Wu, 2011;de Vries eiaZ., 2010;Hilmer, 2005;Mitchell, 1983;Sasaki, Horikawa, and Hotta, 1976).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%