2018
DOI: 10.1029/2018jc013967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wave Runup Over Steep Rocky Cliffs

Abstract: Wave runup is known to depend on offshore wave conditions and coastal morphology.While most field studies on wave runup have focused on low-to-mild-sloping sandy beaches, runup measurements on steep and irregular rocky cliff profiles are still very scarce. Here we investigate the physical processes controlling wave runup in such environments and the range of applicability of empirical runup formula. This study focuses on the steep rocky cliffs (0.1 < tan < 0.4) of Banneg Island, a small island located in the M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect can be quantified by the wave‐height‐to‐depth ratio, which reaches maximal values of 0.8, 0.75, and 0.73 for A2, Ref, and A1, respectively. The reverse process has been observed for concave upward profile on steep rock cliffs (Dodet et al, ). For our site, this mechanism is expected to be sensitive to the incoming wave height, with a greater response for moderate wave conditions during which breaking occurs on the most curved portion of the forereef.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…This effect can be quantified by the wave‐height‐to‐depth ratio, which reaches maximal values of 0.8, 0.75, and 0.73 for A2, Ref, and A1, respectively. The reverse process has been observed for concave upward profile on steep rock cliffs (Dodet et al, ). For our site, this mechanism is expected to be sensitive to the incoming wave height, with a greater response for moderate wave conditions during which breaking occurs on the most curved portion of the forereef.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Guza and Thornton, 1981;Holman and Sallenger, 1985;Raubenheimer et al 2001;Apotsos et al 2007, Nicolae-Lerma et al 2017Guérin et al 2018). Wave setup can exceed 1 m under storm waves (Pedreros et al 2018;Guérin et al 2018;Dodet et al 2018) and can therefore have a relevant contribution in storm surges. As a rough guideline, wave setup along the shoreline of sandy beaches represent about 10 to 20 % of the significant wave height at the breaking point.…”
Section: Wave Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, wind generated waves accumulate and transport momentum across ocean basins and release it to the water column when they break in the shallow surf zone. The rapid decrease in momentum flux is compensated by a tilting of the water surface between the breakpoint and the waterline (Longuet-Higgins and Stewart, 1964), which can rise the time-averaged sea level at the waterline by up to 1 m (Pedreros et al 2018;Guérin et al 2018;Dodet et al 2018). This effect, called the wave setup, is modulated by long waves with periods of the order of one minute that travel at the speed of the wave groups and rapidly grow (from centimeters to decimeters) in the surf zone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sea states are thus much less uniform than previously imagined, with important consequences for applications. Also, the importance of waves for coastal sea level (Ponte, 2019) , is naturally providing requirements for the accuracy and stability of wave heights and periods that are key variables for explaining extreme sea level (e.g., Stockdon et al, 2006;Poate et al, 2016;Dodet et al, 2018). In particular, consistency with the requirements on mean sea level, is calling for an adjustment on the requirements for sea state as previously defined by GCOS-200 (Belward, 2016).…”
Section: Updating Requirements For Sea State Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%