2013
DOI: 10.1126/science.1241514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Waveform Tomography Reveals Channeled Flow at the Base of the Oceanic Asthenosphere

Abstract: Understanding the relationship between different scales of convection that drive plate motions and hotspot volcanism still eludes geophysicists. Using full-waveform seismic tomography, we imaged a pattern of horizontally elongated bands of low shear velocity, most prominent between 200 and 350 kilometers depth, which extends below the well-developed low-velocity zone. These quasi-periodic fingerlike structures of wavelength ~2000 kilometers align parallel to the direction of absolute plate motion for thousands… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
249
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(266 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
17
249
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wide low-wavespeed features (3-5) beneath or adjacent to regions once hypothesized to harbor narrow plume conduits are now unequivocally broad rather than smeared out, unresolved narrow features (1,2). Some early studies (25,26), using near-vertical rays, mapped broad near-vertical low-velocity regions, but these were nevertheless interpreted as "mantle plumes."…”
Section: Top-down Tectonicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wide low-wavespeed features (3-5) beneath or adjacent to regions once hypothesized to harbor narrow plume conduits are now unequivocally broad rather than smeared out, unresolved narrow features (1,2). Some early studies (25,26), using near-vertical rays, mapped broad near-vertical low-velocity regions, but these were nevertheless interpreted as "mantle plumes."…”
Section: Top-down Tectonicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhou et al 2005;Kustowski et al 2008;Panning et al 2010;Lekić & Romanowicz 2011;French et al 2013;Auer et al 2014;Chang et al 2014;Moulik & Ekström 2014). Here, we compare our β h (z) upper-mantle model CAM2016SH with four recent β h (z) upper-mantle models: FFSW1 (Zhou et al 2005), S362ANI , SAW642ANb (Panning et al 2010) and SEMum2 (French et al 2013). The first of these is a β h (z) model whereas the later three are radial anisotropic (ξ ) model from which we have extracted the β h (z) component using the relationships between the ξ model and β h (z) given in those papers.…”
Section: O R R E L At I O N W I T H O T H E R β β H (Z) M O D E L Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latest tool for assimilating this information into seismic velocity models is fully three-dimensional (3-D) waveform tomography [e.g., Tarantola, 1988;Tromp et al, 2005;Chen et al, 2007aChen et al, , 2007bBen Hadj Ali et al, 2009a, 2009bChen, 2011;Fichtner, 2011;Lekic and Romanowicz, 2011;Liu and Gu, 2012;Colli et al, 2013;Fichtner et al, 2013;French et al, 2013;Prieux et al, 2013;Schiemenz and Igel, 2013]. Full-3-D tomography (F3DT) accounts for the physics of wave excitation and propagation by numerically solving the inhomogeneous equations of motion for a heterogeneous, anelastic solid [Olsen et al, 1995;Komatitsch and Tromp, 1999;Cui et al, 2010;Peter et al, 2011].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%