PURPOSE: To evaluate the postoperative ocular optical quality using a double-pass method and assess visual outcomes in eyes with an apodized multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) and to correlate the findings with IOL power.SETTING: Vissum Corporation, Alicante, Spain. DESIGN: Case series.
METHODS:This study evaluated eyes that had cataract surgery with implantation of an AcrySof ReSTOR SN6AD3 multifocal IOL. Near and far visual acuities were measured postoperatively at 1 month and 6 months. Ocular optical quality was assessed at 1 month using a double-pass system (Optical Quality Analysis System), and the point-spread function (PSF) and modulation transfer function (MTF) were characterized.
RESULTS:The study included 38 eyes of 19 patients with a mean age of 63.4 years G 8.4 (SD). The improvements in uncorrected distance visual acuity (from 0.57 G 0.31 logMAR preoperatively to 0.11 G 0.13 logMAR 1 month postoperatively and 0.11 G 0.12 logMAR at 6 months) were statistically significant (P<.00001), as were the improvements in uncorrected near visual acuity (0.76 G 0.40 logMAR preoperatively to 0.21 G 0.11 logMAR and 0.12 G 0.09 logMAR, respectively) (P<.00001). The IOL power correlated significantly with PSF width (r Z 0.57, P Z .017) and the MTF cutoff frequency (r Z 脌0.36, P Z .05). Furthermore, the lower the IOL power, the better the near and distance visual acuities, especially 1 month postoperatively.
CONCLUSION:The apodized multifocal IOL restored distance and near visual function, although IOL power was a limiting factor to the final visual outcomes and optical quality. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36:2048-2055 Q 2010 ASCRS and ESCRSMultifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) were designed to provide complete visual rehabilitation in pseudophakic patients by incorporating 2 foci for near and far. Because the 2 images work simultaneously in the retina (near focus and far focus), near vision improvement is always at the expense of far vision. Multifocal IOLs can reduce retinal image quality, significantly decreasing the patient's visual performance. Negative effects of multifocal IOLs, such as decreased contrast sensitivity, glare disability, and halos, have been reported. 1-3 Thus, some patients, such as those who are professional drivers, are not considered good candidates for multifocal IOL implantation.Some multifocal IOLs are hybrid models that combine apodized diffractive and refractive technologies to provide quality near and distance vision. The advantages of apodized diffractive versus refractive multifocal IOLs have been reported. 4 Hybrid multifocal IOLs with an aspheric optic were designed to reduce the unwanted visual phenomena associated with spherical multifocal IOL performance and to increase the range of focus, thus improving retinal image quality. 5 Studies 6-9 report that IOLs with an aspheric optic provide better contrast sensitivity than IOLs with a spherical optic.Although the objective opt...