2018 Sensor Data Fusion: Trends, Solutions, Applications (SDF) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/sdf.2018.8547094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wavefront Orientation Estimation Based on Progressive Bingham Filtering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it is also of interest to evaluate the filter’s performance in real-world tasks. Potential application scenarios include orientation estimation using omnidirectional vision [ 5 ], visual tracking on unit hyperspheres [ 39 ], bearing-only localization in sensor networks [ 40 ], wavefront orientation estimation in the surveillance field [ 29 ] and sound source localization [ 41 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, it is also of interest to evaluate the filter’s performance in real-world tasks. Potential application scenarios include orientation estimation using omnidirectional vision [ 5 ], visual tracking on unit hyperspheres [ 39 ], bearing-only localization in sensor networks [ 40 ], wavefront orientation estimation in the surveillance field [ 29 ] and sound source localization [ 41 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, deterministic samples of small sizes are less likely to degenerate and become more deployable for nonlinear estimation. Similar schemes have also been proposed for estimating angular systems [ 28 ] and Bingham-based hyperspherical filtering [ 29 ] with non-identity measurement models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed method could be enhanced in two ways: (1) For non-identity measurement models with a known likelihood function, the progressive update method [33], [34] could be used in conjunction with the proposed sampling scheme for further improvement on filtering performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare the sample reduction-based filter (SRF) proposed in Sec. IV with a plain particle filter (PF) and the SE(2)-Bingham filter (SE2BF) with a progressive update step [14], [27]. As the SE2BF relies on the SE(2)-Bingham distribution [12], we exploit 10 5 random samples for fitting the parametric model offline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%