1994
DOI: 10.1086/133367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wavefront reconstruction error of Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors

Abstract: We have evaluated the wavefront reconstruction error for Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors based on a series of simulations for various numbers of subapertures at various levels of measurement error in determining the Hartmann spot centroids. The optimum number of subapertures is derived for a given magnitude reference star in the cases of photon-noise-limited and detector-noise-limited sensors. When the centroid measuring error is absent, the maximum number of Zemike terms that can be corrected by means of mod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distance between two adjacent intersection points corresponds to 5.2 mm in real space on the telescope's aperture plane. It should be mentioned that compared to the Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor, the maximum number of correctable terms for modal compensation can be about 1/5 of the intersection points [24]. The displacement vectors of the intersection points were calculated with respect to their mean positions.…”
Section: Experimental Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distance between two adjacent intersection points corresponds to 5.2 mm in real space on the telescope's aperture plane. It should be mentioned that compared to the Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor, the maximum number of correctable terms for modal compensation can be about 1/5 of the intersection points [24]. The displacement vectors of the intersection points were calculated with respect to their mean positions.…”
Section: Experimental Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact in the lab only the first 120 FF modes were used since these cover most of the turbulence 'seen' by the SH (see for instance Ref. 7). …”
Section: Interaction Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expectation value of the exponential in equation 2 can be written: fdai Jda2J da3... prob(ai, a2, a3,...) x exp a[Z(') -Z(' + )J} (5) Here the probability density function prob(ai, a2, .) is that of a multivariate Gaussian.…”
Section: The Psf For Modal Aomentioning
confidence: 99%