2017
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0001538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wavelet and Hidden Markov-Based Stochastic Simulation Methods Comparison on Colorado River Streamflow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three scenarios of projection were modeled and evaluated using three statistical performance evaluation measures (RMSE, MAE, and R). The forecasts for 5-and 10-year periods presented remarkably high values of R. Although the value for the 15-year period was low, the result is significant when compared with the results provided in [7], whose authors used a climate hidden Markov model and presented an R 2 of approximately 0.26 for a lead time of 15 years. The model presents an improvement in the information of the dry period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three scenarios of projection were modeled and evaluated using three statistical performance evaluation measures (RMSE, MAE, and R). The forecasts for 5-and 10-year periods presented remarkably high values of R. Although the value for the 15-year period was low, the result is significant when compared with the results provided in [7], whose authors used a climate hidden Markov model and presented an R 2 of approximately 0.26 for a lead time of 15 years. The model presents an improvement in the information of the dry period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The early time series models assumed that the time series came from a stationary or a cyclostationary process [5]. These models performed well for hydrological data without signs of long-term memory or nonlinear dependence [6][7][8][9]. However, as records length increased, low-frequency structures of climate were associated with hydrologic time series.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thyer and Kuczera (2003a,b) extended the approach to multiple sites with the premise that multiyear persistence of large-scale modes of climate variability would influence annual variability. Applications using annual data have also been extended to analyzing and reconstructing annual-resolution paleoclimate data (Prairie et al 2008;Bracken et al 2016;Erkyihun et al 2017). HMMs have also been applied across large spatial scales using spatially correlated gridded data to model precipitation across India (Greene et al 2011) and the Asian summer monsoon (Yoo et al 2010).…”
Section: Methods and Background A Hmms For Characterizing Continentamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2005; Bracken and Rajagopalan 2014; Beckers et al. 2016; Erkyihun and Zagona 2017). Increasingly, the advancing skill of dynamical climate models argues for using climate forecasts to drive pre‐ESP methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%