2017
DOI: 10.1002/sim.7264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wavelet-based scaling indices for breast cancer diagnostics

Abstract: Mammography is routinely used to screen for breast cancer (BC). However, the radiological interpretation of mammogram images is complicated by the heterogeneous nature of normal breast tissue and the fact that cancers are often of the same radiographic density as normal tissue. In this work, we use wavelets to quantify spectral slopes of BC cases and controls and demonstrate their value in classifying images. In addition, we propose asymmetry statistics to be used in forming features which improve the classifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reference 7 discussed the incorporation of tumor shape assessments into estimation of spatial heterogeneity of tumors using fluoro‐deoxyglucose‐PET data. As discussed above, there are differences in data obtained from PET imaging and mammography and those obtained using the MRI or CT technologies, hence, the methods proposed by Roberts et al 6 and O'Sullivan et al 7 may not be directly applicable to analyzing tumor heterogeneity using CT imaging as in the motivating dataset in this article. Reference 8 discussed issues related to measurement error in biomarker data and approaches for taking into account such errors to reduce misclassification of cancer subtypes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reference 7 discussed the incorporation of tumor shape assessments into estimation of spatial heterogeneity of tumors using fluoro‐deoxyglucose‐PET data. As discussed above, there are differences in data obtained from PET imaging and mammography and those obtained using the MRI or CT technologies, hence, the methods proposed by Roberts et al 6 and O'Sullivan et al 7 may not be directly applicable to analyzing tumor heterogeneity using CT imaging as in the motivating dataset in this article. Reference 8 discussed issues related to measurement error in biomarker data and approaches for taking into account such errors to reduce misclassification of cancer subtypes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The proposed measure is based on a distance‐dependent mean deviation from a linear intensity gradation. Reference 6 proposed the use of wavelet‐based scaling indices for prediction of breast cancer diagnosis using mammography imaging. Reference 7 discussed the incorporation of tumor shape assessments into estimation of spatial heterogeneity of tumors using fluoro‐deoxyglucose‐PET data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparative overview of machine learning approaches in BC diagnostic can be found in Kourou et al (2015). Only recently has scaling information found in background tissue come into consideration (Hamilton et al, 2011;Nicolis et al, 2011;Ramírez-Cobo and Vidakovic, 2013;Jeon et al, 2014;Roberts et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on assessing the scaling exponents is rich and the monograph Doukhan et al (2003) provides a comprehensive overview. Diagnostics of breast cancer based on scaling measures of mammograms obtained with orthogonal wavelet transform (DWT) and linear regression can be found in Nicolis et al (2011) and Roberts et al (2017). For the same task, multifractal spectral tools have been used in Ramírez and Vidakovic (2013), while the complex wavelets have been utilized by Jeon et al (2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%