2022
DOI: 10.3390/math10193433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wavelet Density and Regression Estimators for Functional Stationary and Ergodic Data: Discrete Time

Abstract: The nonparametric estimation of density and regression function based on functional stationary processes using wavelet bases for Hilbert spaces of functions is investigated in this paper. The mean integrated square error over adapted decomposition spaces is given. To obtain the asymptotic properties of wavelet density and regression estimators, the Martingale method is used. These results are obtained under some mild conditions on the model; aside from ergodicity, no other assumptions are imposed on the data. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We shall also use the same symbol τ to denote the induced set transformation, which takes, for example, sets B ∈ B m into sets τB ∈ B m+1 ; for instance, see [52]. The naming of strong mixing in the above definition is more stringent than what is ordinarily referred to (when using the vocabulary of measure preserving dynamical systems) as strong mixing, namely to that lim n→∞ P(A ∩ τ −n B) = P(A)P(B) for any two measurable sets A, B; see, for instance [52,53] and more recent references [54][55][56][57][58][59][60]. Hence, strong mixing implies ergodicity, whereas the inverse is not always true (see, e.g., Remark 2.6 in page 50 in connection with Proposition 2.8 in page 51 in [40]).…”
Section: Lleccdf: Numerical Approximation Of Ccdf-modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We shall also use the same symbol τ to denote the induced set transformation, which takes, for example, sets B ∈ B m into sets τB ∈ B m+1 ; for instance, see [52]. The naming of strong mixing in the above definition is more stringent than what is ordinarily referred to (when using the vocabulary of measure preserving dynamical systems) as strong mixing, namely to that lim n→∞ P(A ∩ τ −n B) = P(A)P(B) for any two measurable sets A, B; see, for instance [52,53] and more recent references [54][55][56][57][58][59][60]. Hence, strong mixing implies ergodicity, whereas the inverse is not always true (see, e.g., Remark 2.6 in page 50 in connection with Proposition 2.8 in page 51 in [40]).…”
Section: Lleccdf: Numerical Approximation Of Ccdf-modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following [34,49,50], we will now introduce some basic notations for defining wavelet bases for Hilbert spaces of functions with a few modifications to accommodate our context. In this study, nonlinear, thresholded, wavelet-based estimators are examined.…”
Section: Multiresolution Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [49], we have considered the wavelet basis for the nonparametric estimation of density and regression functions for continuous functional stationary processes in Hilbert space. We have characterized the mean integrated square errors.…”
Section: Introduction and Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some motivations to consider ergodic dependence structure in the data rather than a mixing one are discussed in Refs. [67,68].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%