Wavelet Analysis and Applications
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7643-7778-6_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wavelet Leaders in Multifractal Analysis

Abstract: The properties of several multifractal formalisms based on wavelet coefficients are compared from both mathematical and numerical points of view. When it is based directly on wavelet coefficients, the multifractal formalism is shown to yield, at best, the increasing part of the weak scaling exponent spectrum. The formalism has to be based on new multiresolution quantities, the wavelet leaders, in order to yield the entire and correct spectrum of Hölder singularities. The properties of this new multifractal for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
173
0
3

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
173
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, a theoretically well-grounded and practically efficient formulation that, unlike WTMM and MFDFA, extends well to higher dimensional signals, has been proposed: It relies on wavelet leaders, constructed as local suprema of discrete wavelet coefficients, cf. [16,23,24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, a theoretically well-grounded and practically efficient formulation that, unlike WTMM and MFDFA, extends well to higher dimensional signals, has been proposed: It relies on wavelet leaders, constructed as local suprema of discrete wavelet coefficients, cf. [16,23,24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the wavelet leaders are the only multiscale quantities that were shown theoretically to be able to actually characterize the Hölder exponent [16,23,24,25]. Conversely, the practical use of a particular regularity exponent necessitates the construction of multiscale quantities specifically tailored to it, requiring the verification of global a priori regularity assumptions, which may not always hold for the data to be analyzed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, GMWP and DFA loc both had a larger overestimation of the spectrum width of monofractal signals, as compared with MFDFA, LWT, and entropy analysis. A shortcoming of the benchmark test conducted by Turiel et al (2008) was the inclusion of other multifractal analyses based on q-order statistics, which have inferior performance, as compared with analyses included in the present study (Jaffard, Lashermes, & Abry, 2006;Oświęcimka, Kwapien, & Drozdz, 2006;Serrano & Figliola, 2009). Another shortcoming of the benchmark test conducted by Turiel et al (2008) was the use of random cascades that are not appropriate candidates to mimic the intermittent variation in behavioral variables by their scale-discrete nature and strictly positive values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Do ponto de vista prático, o termo ( √ a) −1 apresentado na Equação 3é substituído por (a) −1 . Mais detalhes podem ser encontrados em [29,34]. Um exemplo de uso da CWT com essa normalização L 1é encontrado no pacote FRACLAB, do ambiente scilab 3 , queé indicado para estudos de sinais fractais, ou em [28], em que estudos da amplitude do sinal são de interesse.…”
Section: Normalizaçõesunclassified