[1992] Proceedings of the IEEE-SP International Symposium on Time-Frequency and Time-Scale Analysis
DOI: 10.1109/tftsa.1992.274217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wavelet localization of the Radon transform in even dimensions

Abstract: One of the strange phenomena associated with the Radon Transform is the following: In odd dimensions local values of a function f : R" + R can be determined by local measurements of the integrals of f over n -1 dimensional hyperplanes. In even dimensions, local values are globally dependent on the integrals over hyperplanes. In this paper we use the wavelet transform to essentially localize the Radon Transform in even dimensions. We believe that this will be of great consequence in the ever growing field of me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The other traditional approach to regularizing the noisy data problem is statistically based. This method starts with a statistical model for the noisy observations based on (2): yk = Tkf + nk (18) where nk is taken as an additive noise vector at angle k. This observation model is then coupled with a 2-D Markov random field (MRF) prior model [25,26] for f to yield a direct MAP estimate of the object f. While statistically based, thus allowing the systematic inclusion of prior information, the 2-D spatially-local MRF prior models used for the object generally lead to optimization problems that are extremely computationally complex. As a result, these methods have traditionally not found favor in practical applications.…”
Section: Multiscale Regularized Reconstructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The other traditional approach to regularizing the noisy data problem is statistically based. This method starts with a statistical model for the noisy observations based on (2): yk = Tkf + nk (18) where nk is taken as an additive noise vector at angle k. This observation model is then coupled with a 2-D Markov random field (MRF) prior model [25,26] for f to yield a direct MAP estimate of the object f. While statistically based, thus allowing the systematic inclusion of prior information, the 2-D spatially-local MRF prior models used for the object generally lead to optimization problems that are extremely computationally complex. As a result, these methods have traditionally not found favor in practical applications.…”
Section: Multiscale Regularized Reconstructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in Section 3, we then allow the resulting projection domain coefficients to induce a 2-D object representation through the back-projection and summation operations. To this end we start with an observation equation relating the noisy data Yk to the FBP object coefficients zk, rather than the corresponding 2-D object f as is done in (18). Such a relationship may be found in the FBP relationship (4), which in the presence of noise in the data becomes:…”
Section: Multiscale Regularized Reconstructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is due to the expectation that by employing a function having a sufficient amount of zero moments, the support will remain essentially unchanged. Wavelet filters are functions with compact support and can be constructed with a certain amount of zero moments [3], [28], [29]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%