2000 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37100)
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2000.859053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wavelet packets based features selection for voiceless plosives classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other approaches have compared time series at various resolutions, but comparing the time series focusing on their time-frequency properties using the continuous wavelet transform as we did has not, to our knowledge, been done (Lukasik 2000, Keogh et al 2001). …”
Section: Time Series Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other approaches have compared time series at various resolutions, but comparing the time series focusing on their time-frequency properties using the continuous wavelet transform as we did has not, to our knowledge, been done (Lukasik 2000, Keogh et al 2001). …”
Section: Time Series Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, wavelet-based features have been reported to perform better in some of the phoneme recognition problems Datta, 2000, 2001;Lukasik, 2000;Mallat, 1997). In this paper, we report the recognition performance of wavelet-based features and compare it with the LPC-and MFCC-based features (Atal, 1974;Markel and Gray, 1982;O'Shaughnessy, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The best-basis algorithm was developed for compact signal representations, whereas the LDB algorithm was developed for classification applications. The LDB algorithm has been successfully used to address few realworld classification problems (SPOONER, 2001;CHRISTIAN, 2002;LUKASIK, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%