2022
DOI: 10.1177/14759217221117101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wavelet sparsity enhancement for extracting transient vibration signatures of bearing structural damages

Abstract: Wavelet methods are widely used in mechanical transient vibration signature detection and fault diagnosis. Undesirable artifacts (e.g., spurious noise spikes and pseudo-Gibbs components) are serious issues for the mainstream methods, probably resulting in inaccurate analysis results. For this reason, a new wavelet sparsity enhancement methodology is proposed to achieve artifact-free extraction of bearing transient vibration signatures. The wavelet sparsity is enhanced through two aspects—that is, wavelet basis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[2][3][4][5][6] Vibration contains a large amount of real-time running health information of rotating components and it is easy to be monitored continuously during machine operation. [7][8][9][10][11] When localized damage exists in a gear, one of the obvious changes in vibration is that the vibration will contain extra repetitive impulse components caused by the repeated impact between the damage point and the meshing gear tooth. In vibration-based gear health monitoring, however, the fault signatures are usually corrupted by unknown impulse response function (IRF) and interference components (such as background noise, gear meshing harmonic components, and electromagnetic impulses) in vibration measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6] Vibration contains a large amount of real-time running health information of rotating components and it is easy to be monitored continuously during machine operation. [7][8][9][10][11] When localized damage exists in a gear, one of the obvious changes in vibration is that the vibration will contain extra repetitive impulse components caused by the repeated impact between the damage point and the meshing gear tooth. In vibration-based gear health monitoring, however, the fault signatures are usually corrupted by unknown impulse response function (IRF) and interference components (such as background noise, gear meshing harmonic components, and electromagnetic impulses) in vibration measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%