2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10208-020-09452-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wavenumber-Explicit hp-FEM Analysis for Maxwell’s Equations with Transparent Boundary Conditions

Abstract: The time-harmonic Maxwell equations at high wavenumber k are discretized by edge elements of degree p on a mesh of width h. For the case of a ball as the computational domain and exact, transparent boundary conditions, we show quasi-optimality of the Galerkin method under the k-explicit scale resolution condition that a) kh/p is sufficient small and b) p/ log k is bounded from below. *

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• a bounded analytic domain with impedance boundary conditions (Melenk & Sauter, 2011, Case I), or • a 2D polygonal domain with impedance boundary conditions (Melenk & Sauter, 2011, Case II) and (Esterhazy & Melenk, 2012, Equation 9), or • the exterior of an analytic domain with Dirichlet boundary conditions on the scatterer and the Sommerfeld radiation condition at infinity (Melenk & Sauter, 2011, Case III). We also mention similar results for the Maxwell system set in a ball with transparent boundary conditions, see Melenk & Sauter (2018).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• a bounded analytic domain with impedance boundary conditions (Melenk & Sauter, 2011, Case I), or • a 2D polygonal domain with impedance boundary conditions (Melenk & Sauter, 2011, Case II) and (Esterhazy & Melenk, 2012, Equation 9), or • the exterior of an analytic domain with Dirichlet boundary conditions on the scatterer and the Sommerfeld radiation condition at infinity (Melenk & Sauter, 2011, Case III). We also mention similar results for the Maxwell system set in a ball with transparent boundary conditions, see Melenk & Sauter (2018).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…where r = min c∈C r c is the distance to the corners, α l = α l + l − l * , and α l is a fixed positive real number satisfying (33) l…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation implies that the above operators admit so-called "element-by-element" constructions: Remark 2.9. As described in more detail in [26,Sec. 8] , Π L 2 p , that map into the standard spaces of piecewise polynomials W p+1 (T ), Nédélec spaces Q p (T ), or Raviart-Thomas spaces V p (T ).…”
Section: The Operators In 2dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5] and in particular the proof of[15, Thm. 5.5] for details.Similarly as in[14], one can show that for the Galerkin method based on S := S p,1 (\scrT h ) and fixed constant C > 0, there exists a constant c > 0 such that the resolution condition Downloaded 11/06/20 to 130.60.47.196. Redistribution subject to SIAM license or copyright; see https://epubs.siam.org/page/terms ensures convergence and quasi-optimality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%