1980
DOI: 10.2514/3.57771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Waverider Configurations Derived from Inclined Circular and Elliptic Cones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we present the results of a set of simulations conducted at a Mach number of 8 and Reynolds number of 8.316x10 6 based on the length of the forebody geometry. We are seeking to maximize two objectives: the lift to drag ratio (L/D) and the volumetric efficiency (V/A, volume of the forebody geometry/wetted area excluding the base plane).…”
Section: Parameterization Flexibility Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here we present the results of a set of simulations conducted at a Mach number of 8 and Reynolds number of 8.316x10 6 based on the length of the forebody geometry. We are seeking to maximize two objectives: the lift to drag ratio (L/D) and the volumetric efficiency (V/A, volume of the forebody geometry/wetted area excluding the base plane).…”
Section: Parameterization Flexibility Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the introduction of the idea, various approaches to designing such geometries have been proposed [4][5][6], the majority of which are inverse design methods where the bodies are generated utilizing calculated supersonic flowfields and stream tracing techniques. Early inverse design methods were based on planar and axisymmetric shockwave flowfields, both of which were limited by the poor balance of L/D ratios, volumetric efficiency and ease of engine inlet integration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that the osculating cones method itself was developed with inlet design in mind. At this stage we have been mostly using the osculating cones method for both, though the osculating axisymmetry 3 and osculating flowfield 4 extensions of the method can potentially further improve the configuration. After describing the geometry generation process, we will look into how it can be integrated onto waverider forebodies generated with inverse design methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Waveriders are lifting body geometries designed to keep the shockwave generated by the oncoming hypersonic flow attached to the entire leading edge, effectively trapping the high-pressure region behind the shockwave at the underside of the body, greatly increasing the lift. Since their introduction, inverse design methods have been extensively used to generate such geometries [1][2][3][4] , usually based on planar or axisymmetric flowfields. One of the later and more flexible inverse design methods for generating waverider and inlet geometries is the osculating cones method 5 , which has also been further developed to allow greater flexibility in defining the shock generating body on each osculating plane [6][7] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It adds higher stealth characteristics to the inlet [2] and helps in reduction of aircraft weight by replacing its inlet mechanism [3,4,5].Also, Diverter less Supersonic Inlet (DSI) provides favorable mass flow rates as compared to clean intake [6].The parent theory behind the design of bump is based on Waverider concept [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%